pull down to refresh

I know many people who gamble on matches. They also get their money back if the match is tied, whether they win or lose in super over
This isn't gambling. Don't relate it with that. This is just a way to be engaged with the sports.

Strong Words: it's not gambling.

reply
If it is a problem for you to express my opinion on any point, then you should never mention me in any of your posts. In my opinion, you do not want anyone to win. I just wanted a fair chance for everyone. There are 50 plus game in world cup and I am taking about only 2 game
reply
Why do you say "you do not want anyone to win"?
I didn't read anywhere that if we all get eliminated no one wins. Doesn't the last one eliminated win? So how can that be not wanting anyone to win?
reply
I had only asked people for their opinion, but instead of having a healthy discussion, @Coinsreporter refuting others. That's why I said the following.
reply
I see. Well, it seems from the comments everyone is good with super over being the tiebreaker and from coinsreporter's perspective it is a lot easier to administer a pool if there are no ties. I understand your frustration if you think the rules were not clear but I have run many of these pools on SN and they are a lot of work, so trying to keep rules simple and no have ties is very helpful to the person running it. Personally, I think he is doing a good job for his first SN pool.
reply
Thanks for the appreciation.
Please read the rules here.
A T20 eliminates the possibility of a tie with the super over. Hence, there's no question of a tie.
reply
I think, you haven't read today's pool post entirely. You have to read if you want to be informed. Otherwise, it's all black.
I've asked stackers if they want the minimum 3 match loss to high up to 6 or 7 but everyone said it's fine. Also, if you lose, you have the option to rejoin the pool. Many eliminated stackers have joined the pool today.
reply