pull down to refresh
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @frostdragon 9 Aug 2022 \ on: Mainstream public will never self-custody because it's too difficult. Right? bitcoin
I think we’re at a time in history where people value access over ownership. See: subscriptions vs one time payment, outsourcing anything and everything to a third party, including money, debt, etc. “Elites” (to use a cringy term) seem to think things will keep going this direction, but I think the pendulum will swing back, especially as bitcoin takes the stage.
That being said, I feel like it might take a generation or two to completely phase out third party custody. I think a lot of people would rather keep their keys with a “secure third party” than take responsibility for their financial well-being.
To be fair, I don’t think it will be completely unreasonable to use a third party secure storage. Give the “new bank” your keys for a small fee, and you’re back to password/MFA with a thick extra layer of ID verification for recovery. They’d be more like a security company than a bank. Fear of losing keys will drive people to this at first.
Because at the moment, self-custody is a foreign idea. But it’ll just be a matter of time before this doesn’t work anymore.
Great Mercedes quote btw.
I feel both the maximalist zero trust mentality and also the I don't mind handing over the keys to a serious third party one.
Honestly, I think we polarize this unnecessarily at times. Why can't someone have part of their stack in their own custody, and part on one or multiple third parties?
This can also change over time. Third party goes draconian? Move everything to self custody. Third party is offering good conditions? Move a chunk back with them.
reply
So actually, the happy medium here is collaborative custody multisig. Check out Unchained - they have a bunch of material on this.
With 2 of 3 multisig, you can have full control of your wallet, and the secure third party just acts as a backup for the third wallet in case something happens to one of yours. It’s by far the most secure option imo because it eliminates all single points of failure.
I think this is what most people will use in the end. For now, multisig especially feels foreign to people imo. Just a matter of time before the mentality shifts.
reply