I'm generally not that big of a fan of Bitcoin documentaries, and the one I've seen yesterday further underpins my opinion. It's called "Bitcoin- The New Future?".
It's the typical "Let's interview some kinda known figures in the space - Roger Ver, 'Crypto Kid' and, I forgot his name, another guy who's kinda known in the financial world -, do this as well with some sceptics - The 'real' wolf of Wallstreet, who's a known scammer, a harvard professor, and, again, a guy I forgot the name of - and cut out the sporadic parts where they say something that fits our needs for the format, then call it a documentary".
"Let's also not include any of the technicals behind Bitcoin - the host literally said something along the lines of: we'll not explain mining to y'all, it's complex and not important (for the show), but if it's a Bitcoin documentary, how can that not be important? -, instead, let's gather all these opinions, throw in some opinions and experiences of Shitcoiners as well, a Lambo here, a yacht there, and boom, done!"
It's painful to watch, especially because I'd argue that it's the complex, technical nature of Bitcoin which makes it not only excitingly beautiful, but also work.
It's important that people hear about the technicals, the how and why, not the same regurgitated shit about hypes, bubbles, FOMO, volatility and the possibility of being "hacked" (through leaving your coins on an exchange and the exchange failing their job of taking proper custody of the assets) - they literally said this, but "forgot" to say a single word about self custody - an integral part of interacting with- and owning bitcoin FFS!
They weren't shy to scare people into being paranoid of being kidnapped and what not for owning bitcoin, though.
It's beyond me how producers look at this shift and go: "yeah, this is lit, publish it!"
Idiots at the levers.