Fair point, but I'm trying to get at the basic illogic behind these people who are trying to claim 1 sat != 1 sat
You can't really say the sats in any input end up in any particular output. So it seems like they try to say all outputs from a txn that has a tainted input are now tainted. The result is that there will come a point when most sats (if not all) sats are tainted.
yes, using LN you will break that trace, paying sat by sat. Think also about using MPP through multiple channels, with multiple routes. There's no way to find which sat belongs to which UTXO.
reply