Huge kudos to the in-depth and well written issue here! I look forward to reading the comments to see what other people are thinking because I am honestly right in the middle about what should or should not be done. I see the pros and cons of both and maybe someone in the comments will finally hit me with a point that swings me more one way or another!
Thanks. I'm leaning towards the more minimal interventions, like unpaid anonymous sheriffs who have no extra power or pay.
reply
deleted by author
reply
You're getting at a good point: these ideas and others could be implemented at the territory level, as well as the site level.
Maybe SN would adopt a very minimal intervention, while territories get more ambitious.
reply
deleted by author
reply
I just hadn't thought about each territory being able to choose which of these to do.
It would be interesting to grant them some of those other powers. I don't see why they shouldn't have banishment powers or maybe something like bail, where you have to pay a fine to regain access.
reply
deleted by author
reply