reply on: Incentivizing Downzapping \ stacker news ~meta

20 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 24 Jul \ parent \ on: Incentivizing Downzapping meta

Thanks. I'm leaning towards the more minimal interventions, like unpaid anonymous sheriffs who have no extra power or pay.

42 sats \ 4 replies \ @carlosfandango 24 Jul

deleted by author

20 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 24 Jul

You're getting at a good point: these ideas and others could be implemented at the territory level, as well as the site level.

Maybe SN would adopt a very minimal intervention, while territories get more ambitious.

21 sats \ 2 replies \ @carlosfandango 24 Jul

deleted by author

20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 24 Jul

I just hadn't thought about each territory being able to choose which of these to do.

It would be interesting to grant them some of those other powers. I don't see why they shouldn't have banishment powers or maybe something like bail, where you have to pay a fine to regain access.

69 sats \ 0 replies \ @carlosfandango 24 Jul

deleted by author