I think that's more of the bottom-up perspective. The top-down perspective would be more about what percentage of the worlds energy id needed for securing the hard money and peoples savings - and what percentage is needed for producing actual stuff and creating value. Although, this might be the harder question to answer
The link for this post uses a read-only front-end for Twitter, which can be easier to read for viewing a full Twitter thread. The Tweet that kicked off the thread is:
Great thread
Interesting thread.
I think that's more of the bottom-up perspective. The top-down perspective would be more about what percentage of the worlds energy id needed for securing the hard money and peoples savings - and what percentage is needed for producing actual stuff and creating value. Although, this might be the harder question to answer
Impressive thread!
The link for this post uses a read-only front-end for Twitter, which can be easier to read for viewing a full Twitter thread. The Tweet that kicked off the thread is:
view on twitter.comThe report by the author, shared at the end of the thread, is protected and requires an e-mail to be read. But that can be found here:
How much energy will Bitcoin consume in the future?
https://arcane.no/research/how-much-energy-will-bitcoin-consume-in-the-future