pull down to refresh

Valencia has introduced tough measures against short-term vacation rentals, similar to those in Barcelona. Homeowners in Valencia now face fines up to €600,000 for renting out rooms for short stays, a move led by tourism head Nuria Montes to curb mass tourism's negative impacts. As always, left-wing politicians are quick to put themselves at the head of short-term popular movements.
While addressing community concerns, this crackdown raises significant questions about property rights - a fundamental aspect for any civilization, but one that no longer plays a role in modern-day Europe, as everything tends towards socialism. Many homeowners argue for the freedom to utilize their properties as they see fit, including renting them for extra income. This perspective underscores the importance of individual property rights and the economic benefits of tourism. Supporters contend that such freedoms are fundamental and that homeowners should not be overly restricted by government regulations which are put in place to undermine property rights whereever it is possible.
On the other hand, opponents of short-term rentals highlight issues such as housing shortages, inflated property prices, and neighborhood disruptions. They believe stricter regulations are necessary to preserve affordable housing and community character. Valencia and Barcelona's actions reflect a growing trend among cities to prioritize community welfare over individual property rights.
This ongoing debate between property rights and community impact is crucial as cities globally observe how European destinations navigate these challenges. Valencia's new measures could influence similar tourist-heavy cities facing comparable issues.
Tourism is a significant part of Spain’s economy, contributing around 13% to the national GDP and employing roughly 2.6 million people.
Bloomberg-Article: https://shorturl.at/Shbtr
WTF! Spanish people don't have any property of their own! I always thought European countries to be a paradise to practice freedom but this is pure slavery.
reply
I once read somewhere that the strange climate regulation in these countries alone contains over 40,000 individual regulations and the trend is growing
reply
reply
When dealing with commies: The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.
reply
And the driver is resentment
reply
The EU is progressing very fast towards a full socialist "utopia" with complete state surveillance.
The PR machine is doing a good job in painting Europe as a paradise but it's only that if you want to own nothing and be ruled by unelected bureaucrats.
reply
Nothing says "progressive" like a reactionary impulse to oppose all change.
reply
what changes? In fact, fines will burden home owners.
reply
The change is large numbers of people renting out their homes to vacationers.
reply
Should renting out a home to tourists be subject to short-term penalties? even though they have rights as tourists.
reply
reply
If I tell you that I never pay any taxes on my property in India. Would you believe it?
We, Indians, only pay stamp duties when we buy land and want/should register it in the court to get it protected by law. The person who is the owner of the property here can do whatever he wants to do with his property abiding with the law. No compelling by any form of government whatsoever. That's why you'll often find many roads to be winding in India because some owners of properties falling midway of a highway refuse to give their land to construct a highway there. The owners refuse when for such purpose property is compensated with a 10 gold money for the actual cost.
The property rights in India are much much better than the west I must say.
reply
I agree! India is better because the constitution serves as the premises for the property rights. Every property is the property of it's true owner. The municipality in my locality tax is for facilities like water and cleanliness but not for our property. However people call it house tax which is incorrect. And who cares when it's hardly 400 to 500 INR annually?
reply
You can laugh at the property rights of USASR and EUSSR.
Thanks for the info!
reply
As a Spanish this makes me very indignant, private property here is a joke in bad taste, but we have what we deserve, for having voted what we have voted for, a fine of 600,000 euros... Incredible.
reply
The punishment doesn’t fit the crime
Of course if the houses are used to house immigrants then you receive money from the government
reply
True, but there are still many people who still believe that socialism and all this crap is going to go somewhere, Spain is not even half of what it once was, and worst of all, there are still 3 and a half years of more socialist mandate until new elections...
Let's not even talk about the issue of immigration here, my hometown looks like a town in Africa.
reply
Here in Andalucía the same kind of debate is cooking. 35% of our GDP depends on tourism. Fu..ing commie idiots
reply
I live in Valencia right now, more especially in Alicante, I am Andalusian by blood, but I see first-hand how important tourism is here, it is outrageous, Andalusia is one of the poorest autonomous communities in Spain, they want to destroy it from what I see, my whole family lives there...
reply
But there is still a strong resistance of tradition and family structures to fight backb against the socialist vandals
reply
True, the problem is that everyone I talk to, tell me they are right-wing voters or do not support the socialist party PSOE or its derivatives, I don't know why they have won again, it is incredible.
reply
32 sats \ 1 reply \ @TomK OP 3 Aug
S. Abascal! No hay alternativas
reply
Dios te oiga!
reply
How can people allow to dictate government how to use their property? Didn't they pay their money when they bought it? This is one form of tyranny in there. People should deny such instances in unison. The governments are only powerful when people get divided.
reply
13 sats \ 1 reply \ @TomK OP 4 Aug
It's called socialist degeneracy
reply
Thank you so much! Degeneracy is a new thing for me. I've never seen so no chance of knowing it. People should refuse this degeneracy as well.
reply
Mass tourism negative impacts? Isnt their economy built on tourism? Isnt this just protecting the hotel chains instead of figuring out a solution to the problem of housing shortages for tourists?
reply
yes, the protection of the hotel industry is clear. but of course these short-term rentals take away living space. However, the problem here in Europe lies elsewhere: potential house builders are deterred by over-regulation and high taxes. This really does make living space scarce
reply
68 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 3 Aug
How many people actually live there? If they lived there, they wouldnt be renting their houses out. Its just an investment opportunity for most people. Hotel chains could put up more buildings, but they dont want to. They just want to keep it artificially scarce so they can charge a higher fee. Premium service.
reply
Right You are
reply
I didn't know that Spain tourism is that mush high. And what I am guessing right now is that every European countries have lots of torisum for their countries
reply
Spain is relatively cheap with great food, great weather all year, booming nightlife and party scene.
reply
That's why we have swarms of northern pensioneers over here...
reply
Spain is no. 1
reply
21 sats \ 8 replies \ @k00b 3 Aug
Lodging is a commercial use. It doesn't belong in residential neighborhoods.
reply
Decides who? How about private property rights?
reply
21 sats \ 6 replies \ @k00b 3 Aug
Would you let your neighbors replace their homes with a gas station on one side and a fast food drive thru on the other? If not, how about your neighbors private property rights?
reply
There are zoning laws for that, just saying...
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 4 Aug
Yep, and lodging is also commercial use hence does not belong in residential zones.
reply
This is a nonsense of a comparison and You know it.
How about I forbid P2P transactions outside the USD?
reply
38 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 3 Aug
It's not a nonsense comparison. It's a question about whether you believe property rights grant the right to create arbitrary negative externalities or not. Lodging has negative externalities, like other commercial use properties, even if you've never lived next to it to experience it.
reply
Do You know the concept of internalization of external effects by garanties of property rights?
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 3 Aug
Yes, which I agree, as a libertarian, is a theoretical solution to these problems. Only, our judicial systems don’t work so we end up legislating instead, and the only contracts the government likes to enforce are its own.
reply
Nobody likes tourists, that's why these laws are getting introduced.
reply
Nobody. Except of the millions of people that depend on tourism
reply
They are the ones that dislike tourists the most.
reply
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.