pull down to refresh
Either that or make sure the ranges don't intersect. Rather than: 1-21,10-210,100-2100. Do: 1-21,22-210,211-2100.
reply
Or maybe just scaling the lower bound: 1-21,10-31,100-121,1000-1021
Or scaling the lower bound faster (still preventing overlap): 1-21,22-100,101-210,1000-2100
reply
If I understand the second one, there should be a 211-1000. That seems fun, too. The first option seems lame.
reply
Yeah, I messed that one up. The case where the upper bound is larger than 10x the lower bound is weird.
I like the randomness increasing slightly slower though.
reply
That's neat.
reply
It's always fun when seemingly simple problems turn out to be a bit thorny.
If people want to get really wild, you could only scale the upper bound.