pull down to refresh

Terrible for Bitcoin45.5%
Shitcoin Destroyer27.3%
Other (Please comment)27.3%
22 votes \ poll ended
Indifference
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @gmd 4 Aug
Why was he so bad for Bitcoin, other than delaying approval of ETFs, which so many here don’t seem to like anyway?
Seems like appropriately tried to call out shitcoins as securities.
reply
He hates bitcoin and he works for the enemy aka socialist
reply
Why is it only 45 percent that Gary is bad for bitcoin
Reminds me of a previous poll where some naive members said no
Who are these idiots? Or enemies? I know two are @kilianbuhn and @tomlaies
reply
Uhm, I don't understand at all why I'm being mentioned here?
I personally think Bitcoin is impervious to individuals. If you think any human at all can even remotely touch Bitcoin it means you don't Bitcoin.
reply
Gensler is horrible. I'm not a fan of him at all. If he were the Treasury Secretary of the U.S. I bet he would be drooling at the possibility of rolling out a CBDC.
reply
When FTX imploded i think SEC did some shady stuff. Like they swang the banhammer across the industry hurting innocent businesses and people. In general the SEC has been a pita on the industry during his term. I think the reason most people dont think so is because despite of their efforts there was still a bull market. But i could be wrong.
reply
He's terrible for US, for the world and most significantly for himself!
reply
Weasel
reply
All of the above and worse
reply
Where's Gensler? I haven't seen that guy in a decade? There's not much from him these days!
reply
Terrible for Bitcoin.
reply
I can only see one option here "Terrible for Bitcoin".
reply
Terrible for Bitcoin
reply
Terrible in all respects. I'm still convinced he was involved in corruption re SBF.
reply
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.