Obviously that OnlyFans post was made in jest, but what actually stops something like that from happening?
I know that right now @k00b and @ek can take stuff down. That's not the long-term vision, though, right? The dream is for territories to be uncensorable.
We could also think about nostr, rather than SN. It seems like a very easy attack vector would be to flood a platform (using the term loosely) with illicit material. What's the defense against that?
20 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 19 Aug
Territories can be marked nsfw by their founders.
That's not the long-term vision, though, right?
That is not the long-term vision.
What's the defense against that?
A lot of the nostr relays block content they deem inappropriate using AI filters afaik.
reply
Territories can be marked nsfw by their founders.
Let's take an extreme example. In the future, when territories are whatever you ultimately want them to be, what's to stop a bad actor from buying an ordinary territory and loading it up with illicit content?
It seems like you need to maintain a way to break ties with territories that behave in such a way, if you don't want to maintain an ultimate veto right over content.
reply
107 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 19 Aug
To the extent that I've thought about how we'll be decentralized, territory fees are hosting/indexing fees. If we don't host, they don't pay us. If some other territory hoster/indexer wants to host, the illicit territory will pay them, or they'll host/index the toxic/illicit territory themselves and pay no one.
reply