Top PostsTop Posts
- I was a well-paid blockchain / web3 dev for years, but became disillusioned.
- 15.6k sats \ 109 comments \ @Michelson_Morley \ ~bitcoin \
August 19, 2023
- 15.6k sats \ 109 comments \ @Michelson_Morley \ ~bitcoin \
- Dusty Daemon | Core Lightning dev & splicing implementer | AMA
- Banking partners push OnlyFans to ban sexual content... time for a Stacker.News feature spinoff? 😂
Top StackersTop Stackers
- stacker is in hiding for
August 19, 2023 - @andyleroy
- 539 stacked \ 1564 spent \ 1 post \ 5 comments \
August 19, 2022
- 539 stacked \ 1564 spent \ 1 post \ 5 comments \
- @abetusk
- 1 stacked \ 5 spent \ 0 posts \ 1 comment \
August 19, 2021
- 1 stacked \ 5 spent \ 0 posts \ 1 comment \
Top CommentsTop Comments
- #228972 on Weekend Book Recommendations
- 915 sats \ 1 reply \ @blocktock \
August 19, 2023Diamond Age - by Neal Stephenson [...]
- 915 sats \ 1 reply \ @blocktock \
- #60875 on Dusty Daemon | Core Lightning dev & splicing implementer | AMA
- 188 sats \ 4 replies \ @andyleroy \
August 19, 2022With a new implementation like splicing, I am curious what the "adoption" process looks like for getting node operators to use and implement the feature (assuming this is how it works)? [...]
- 188 sats \ 4 replies \ @andyleroy \
- #1228 on Banking partners push OnlyFans to ban sexual content... time for a Stacker.News feature spinoff? 😂
- 4 sats \ 4 replies \ @LibreLoya \
August 19, 2021Theres also the guys at onlycoins.com trying to tackle this problem. [...]
- 4 sats \ 4 replies \ @LibreLoya \
I really appreciated Michelson_Morley’s post. He got a bit of a rough ride here on SN. Some of it deserved. Unfortunate he doesn’t post anymore.
I remember the nym, but I don't recall any interactions. What was the source of conflict?
Mostly tension around his disdain for bitcoin maximalism. He also had a lot of critiques for SN. I believe at one point he said it was doomed to fail unless xyz.
Obviously that OnlyFans post was made in jest, but what actually stops something like that from happening?
I know that right now @k00b and @ek can take stuff down. That's not the long-term vision, though, right? The dream is for territories to be uncensorable.
We could also think about nostr, rather than SN. It seems like a very easy attack vector would be to flood a platform (using the term loosely) with illicit material. What's the defense against that?
Territories can be marked nsfw by their founders.
That is not the long-term vision.
A lot of the nostr relays block content they deem inappropriate using AI filters afaik.
Let's take an extreme example. In the future, when territories are whatever you ultimately want them to be, what's to stop a bad actor from buying an ordinary territory and loading it up with illicit content?
It seems like you need to maintain a way to break ties with territories that behave in such a way, if you don't want to maintain an ultimate veto right over content.
To the extent that I've thought about how we'll be decentralized, territory fees are hosting/indexing fees. If we don't host, they don't pay us. If some other territory hoster/indexer wants to host, the illicit territory will pay them, or they'll host/index the toxic/illicit territory themselves and pay no one.
I have 8 hands 👐 solve this mystery I will give you 1000 sat
Territories btc is domaniteig
It's true for most of us! Isn't it?