pull down to refresh

OK, now you're just being ridiculous. You obviously know no one involved in this conflict nor very much about it to claim that I advocate the slaughtering of children because I argued that the Palestinian leadership in effect uses its [mostly] complicit populace as combatants in the form of human shields and thus Palestinians suffer many more casualties. If you can't distinguish between targeted premeditated killing of women, children and elderly (who were obviously not involved in any combat operations nor even in close proximity to military installations) and collateral damage as a result of reckless premeditated usage of civilians and civilian infrastructure as human shields in a military setting then you're a sorry person who seriously can't distinguish good from evil.
Just out of curiosity, in your opinion, were the 'nova' rave party goers military combatants who deserved to be mowed down by machine guns? How about kibbutz Be'eri's children whose heads were decapitated at point blank?
The most ridiculous part of your post is the patronizing tone and language you use. Have you ever been in the military? In a combat situation? Have you ever been to Israel? (Can you even point Israel out on a map?) It's unbelievable how internet anons who know next to nothing about global politics, warfare and history (or take more than a casual interest), when it comes to Israel, are all of a sudden very well versed in Palestinian history/military affairs and feel entitled to become moral authorities. Check your head homey
this territory is moderated
Netanyahu's only fault is that he's even sitting down at the table with these animals, and not flattening Gaza, transferring the hostile Gazan population to Turkey or Dagestan and starving to submission anyone who chooses to remain in Gaza
Your words, not mine.
reply
Yes, submission means ceasing aggression i.e. unprovoked premeditated killing of Jews. Or is that something you support?
reply
Ok, so you do advocate the slaughter of children. I don't see how I mischaracterized your view then.
I take the radical view that killing innocent people is wrong, despite your lazy and predictable inuendo that I'm antisemitic. Whereas you are taking the view that it's only wrong when done to Jews, but it's perfectly fine when done to Palestinians by Jews.
You see why this type of special pleading is unconvincing, right?
reply
Are you some type of clown? I advocate self defense and eradication of terrorists coming to kill me. If the terrorists' children have to die to protect me and my own (because he uses them as tactical weapons) then so be it. I know this is in contrast to the leftist postmodern worldview that you seemingly espouse but my life takes precedence over those of my enemy. Their death is the consequence of my enemies' actions, not of mine. I have no interest or desire to see dead children as you seem to try to put in my mouth. Shame on you. Also, you couldn't even answer my simple questions and you resort to strawmen. I'm done
reply
I'm not resorting to strawmen. You are advocating for the mass murder of innocent children. Whatever mental gymnastics you have to engage in to get to that position don't really interest me.
That you find it so triggering for someone to say it's wrong to kill children should be a wake up call.
I sincerely do hope you recover from this mental derangement. Good luck.
reply
Oh goodness. The strawman is strong with you. You can keep your good luck. I invite you to Israel. I'll take you to the west bank and Gaza. I'll let you experience first hand what we go through. Man enough to do it?
reply
Challenging my manhood, insinuating I'm antisemitic, and calling me a postmodern leftist, all for maintaining that it's wrong to kill children. Yeah, you're definitely in a healthy place.
Historically, it's the bad guys who openly advocate ethnic cleansing and genocide, while referring to the people they don't like as animals and monsters.
reply
You talk without any regard to the facts, put words into my mouth, attempt to defame me and ignore my questions, so it raises questions regarding your constitution. I like dealing with men of honor and dignity, not keyboard warriors who purport to be experts on topics they have only casual knowledge of and whose main talent seemingly is sophistry and strawmen. If you were a man of truth you'd get off the internet and actually visit the land you so authoritatively express opinions on