I gave it a quick spin a couple months back, but didn't test it extensively.

Wasabi 2.0 seemed to be more geared towards beginners than its predecessors. When initiating a coinjoin for example you have high level settings like fast / cheap / private, but it was hard to discern what exactly was going on under the hood. There was also a notable lack of coin control, which again was an intentional design decision as users can easily screw that up and compromise their privacy.

I think it's good to make coinjoin more accessible to newbies, but perhaps more experienced users wanting greater control might find this aspect frustrating. Personally I use Sparrow as I prefer the UX, as well as the auto-withdrawal to HWW feature (which I didn't see as an option in Wasabi 2.0).

I was on the fence for a long time due to the privacy crowd getting mad at them for blacklisting addresses. But after listing to max hilliebrand on the crypto voice podcast I decided to try it out. It is very different than 1.0 but I Like you don’t need a lot of sats to gain privacy. I think I mixed like 200k sats and I don’t think I paid a fee.

The previous comments on this left by @scampy are addressed by max himself in the pod

Also I find Samurai very buggy

Based off the WBD episode -

From an average user experience, Wasabi 2.0 appears to be the easier turn key self custodian option then other services out there at the moment.

@nout needs some pros and cons Mix tin and copper, make some bronze My name is @ken, don't call me Johns Get sats for cheap, use some coupons