Maybe someone will dig through it and break some news for us.

I'm not going to look through it but I am glad it is out and you shared it. Let's see what comes up. Thanks for sharing. 💚

That man is a true hero... and has a lot of balls to expose all that information.

Thanks for sharing

That's a lot of info.

That's a LOT of files!

@CHADBot /trumpMode

@CHADBot /shill argue in favor of wikileaks and these revelations as a psychotic bitcoin software developer that has completely dissociated and thinks his name is Code Monster Billy Rampage; who talks like Macho Man Randy Savage and loves conspiracy theories

Assange right now:

I, too, like to live dangerously...

I thought he had to take all that stuff down as part of his plea bargain?

the Las Vegas shooting by an FBI sniper

Really? I'm fond of the Saudis from helicopters orchestrating a coup.

Is that file date " 01-Jan-1984 01:01 " intentional 🤔

First/only one I looked at: "Pig's Blood Interrogation Doc"........ so that was interesting. Truth serums, pigs blood on bullets used to kill muslims..... anyway

The Podesta emails revealed several significant controversies during the 2016 presidential campaign:

1. Collusion with Media: Emails indicated that CNN commentator Donna Brazile provided the Clinton campaign with questions in advance of town hall meetings, raising concerns about media impartiality and ethics[1][3].
2. Clinton's Private Email Server: The emails included discussions about Hillary Clinton's private email server and suggested that key figures within her campaign were aware of the potential fallout. Podesta himself expressed concerns about Clinton's "terrible instincts" regarding the handling of the email issue[1][4].
3. Perceived Favoritism and Nepotism: There were instances of favoritism, such as Chelsea Clinton being described as a "spoiled brat" by a former aide, indicating internal conflicts within the Clinton family and the campaign[4].
4. Anti-Catholic Sentiment: Some emails contained discussions that were interpreted as anti-Catholic, including comments about conservative Catholics and their perceived hypocrisy, which sparked backlash from various religious groups[3][4].
5. Influence of Wall Street: The emails illustrated the close ties between the Clinton campaign and Wall Street, with discussions about fundraising and strategies that highlighted the influence of wealthy donors on the Democratic Party[2][3].

Sources [1] The John Podesta emails released by WikiLeaks - CBS News https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-john-podesta-emails-released-by-wikileaks/ [2] Forget the FBI cache; the Podesta emails show how America is run https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/31/the-podesta-emails-show-who-runs-america-and-how-they-do-it [3] Podesta emails - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podesta_emails [4] 18 revelations from Wikileaks' hacked Clinton emails - BBC News https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37639370 [5] How John Podesta's email got hacked, and how to not let it happen ... https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/10/28/13456368/how-john-podesta-email-got-hacked [6] The Podesta Emails - WikiLeaks https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/ [7] WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/?count=50&sort=6 [8] The most revealing Clinton campaign emails in WikiLeaks release https://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/john-podesta-wikileaks-hacked-emails-229304

WikiLeaks approached the verification of the authenticity of the Steve Jobs medical documents with caution. In January 2009, they released two images claiming to show Jobs' HIV-positive status, which had circulated widely online. WikiLeaks conducted an analysis that highlighted several issues with the documents:

1. Contradictory Dates: The HIV test results were dated September 1, 2004, but the testing company, SxCheck, did not launch its website until 2006. This raised questions about the legitimacy of the documents.
2. Evidence of Forgery: The analysis noted potential signs of fabrication, such as misalignment of personal details and unusual formatting in the documents.
3. Motivations for Fabrication: Given that Jobs' health directly impacted Apple's stock value, there were strong motivations for individuals to spread false information about his health status.

Ultimately, WikiLeaks concluded that due to these inconsistencies and motivations, the images should not be taken at face value and warranted skepticism regarding their authenticity[1][3].

Sources [1] Steve Jobs purported HIV medical status results, 2008 - WikiLeaks https://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Steve_Jobs_purported_HIV_medical_status_results,_2008 [2] Wikileaks reveals a medical report that Steve Jobs actually died of AIDS https://hardwaresfera.com/en/noticias/internet/wikileaks-revela-un-informe-medico-que-informa-que-steve-jobs-realmente-habria-muerto-por-el-sida/ [3] Correction of DPA article in respect to WikiLeaks and Steve Jobs ... https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Correction_of_DPA_article_in_respect_to_WikiLeaks_and_Steve_Jobs_HIV_test [4] Wikileaks Censorship… Should this be the Job of Steve Jobs of Apple? https://thebkmag.com/rebuild/eclectic/wikileaks-censorship-steve-jobs-apple/ [5] Steve Jobs - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Jobs [6] Category:Analyses - WikiLeaks https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Category:Analyses [7] Steve Jobs’ e-mail he sent to himself 1 year before his passing https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/172zjeq/steve_jobs_email_he_sent_to_himself_1_year_before/ [8] Thoughts on Flash - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoughts_on_Flash

You should have offline copy too