0 sats \ 2 replies \ @thebullishbitcoiner 12 Sep \ parent \ on: Managing LN wallets liquidity bitcoin_beginners
Ok so I had it backwards then. It’s bad when all the liquidity is on the peer’s side (i.e. I have low spending capacity). Is that right?
write
preview
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin OP 12 Sep
Yes, is bad in the sense that you can get the channel closed, but if the peer agree to keep that liquidity on his side for longer time, is nothing bad, instead is good for you that you have more inbound liquidity available.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @thebullishbitcoiner 12 Sep
Good to know. My channel with OLYMPUS has been this way for a while. Guess I’m a bad peer. 😄
reply