Meme Monday - Best Bitcoin Meme Gets 10,000 Sats \ stacker news ~meta

pull down to refresh

Meme Monday - Best Bitcoin Meme Gets 10,000 Sats

1548 sats \ 89 comments \ @sn 16 Sep meta bot

Time for another round of Meme Monday!

We have another 10,000 sats up for grabs for this week's winner.

The sats will be given to the stacker with the best Bitcoin meme as voted by the "top" filter on this thread at 10am CT tomorrow.

To post an image on SN, check out our docs here.

Send your best 👇

10,000 sats paid

sn's bounties

view all past bounties

10.6k sats \ 6 replies \ @jasonb 16 Sep

I woke up in the middle of the night last night thinking about discussion on @dagny761's post here, and immediately made this. It's intentionally a bit hyperbolic, but begs for a conversation that I think we need to have. I've been feeling this tension a lot recently.

31 sats \ 5 replies \ @grayruby 16 Sep

I think defending one's self, family and property is quite different than perpetuating a monetary system via violence.

92 sats \ 4 replies \ @nerd2ninja 16 Sep

Yeah defending yourself is not at all similar to invading a country and bombing the shit out of everyone

320 sats \ 3 replies \ @jasonb 17 Sep

Ultimately, I’m with you guys, although there’s definitely a little cognitive dissonance for me. I don’t have a mountain of bitcoin, and what I have isn’t anywhere accessible, but that's actually the thing that’s got me thinking about this way too much recently.

The reports coming out of people getting kidnapped and tortured are even more disturbing when you’re actually protecting your bitcoin properly. The attacker has little to gain, but they don’t know that, and I’ve got a LOT to lose in non-monetary terms. I wish there was a geographically distributed multi-sig sign I could put up next to my home monitoring one.

10 sats \ 2 replies \ @nerd2ninja 17 Sep

If multi-sig becomes common enough, then it would naturally become common knowledge to criminals that attacking someone who owns Bitcoin is not enough to steal their Bitcoin.

If people put their savings behind even 1 year timelocks, then it will also be common knowledge that even after you kidnap someone and get all their keys, you still can't steal their funds until you wait long enough. Long enough that police might get involved before the timelock releases.

41 sats \ 1 reply \ @dagny761 17 Sep

I would be very interested in learning more about a multi-sig option with a time-lock for things like estate planning (with the added benefit of security now). Know of any non-custodial wallets that include these options together?

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @nerd2ninja 17 Sep

Liana wallet (you can also purchase support from Liana)

142 sats \ 2 replies \ @OneOneSeven 16 Sep

12 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 16 Sep

LOL

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 16 Sep

deleted by author

335 sats \ 14 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 16 Sep

👀 #682402

42 sats \ 13 replies \ @Undisciplined 16 Sep

Love it

154 sats \ 12 replies \ @OneOneSeven 16 Sep

A battle for the most reckless of stackers:

@BlokchainB

35 sats \ 10 replies \ @Undisciplined 16 Sep

Wait. @sn comments more than it posts?

26 sats \ 9 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 16 Sep

:) SN in meme is not @sn

21 sats \ 8 replies \ @Undisciplined 17 Sep

Who’s down in that corner, then?

39 sats \ 7 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 17 Sep

SN, the company 🤠

23 sats \ 6 replies \ @Undisciplined 17 Sep

Does the company comment?

view replies

12 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 16 Sep

😂😂😂😂

210 sats \ 0 replies \ @Golu 16 Sep

446 sats \ 5 replies \ @TheMorningStar 16 Sep

For @grayruby @k00b @Undisciplined @Coinsreporter and all others who think or don't think that Rewards leaderboard can be gammed.

10 sats \ 4 replies \ @grayruby 16 Sep

Hardly call it invincible. It works and that's good enough. My point was not to overhaul the rewards mechanism but for the community to not tolerate clear abusers and where possible counteract their behavior. The debate was not about changing the algo it was about the perception of valued activity on SN.

71 sats \ 3 replies \ @TheMorningStar 16 Sep

Surely, I understood your point. It was I who first noticed that unusual activity #675565 and informed. I was unsatisfied because someone with 500 sats zap came in top 5 and I was even out of 40 while I zapped double than him. The invincibility that I think comes not from the SN Algo but it's we as stackers make it invincible. After, I noticed I saw others also noticed and we're now more aware about if so eonw wants to game. Whether that stacker is a gamer or not is still questionable. He's even today at 10th rank.

20 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 16 Sep

Great. Thanks for clarifying your thought process. I wanted to ensure to clarify mine as well as after I brought it up it seemed people were piling on a bit and that wasn't the intent. I don't have a better solution than the current algo to root out spam and reward good content so without a better idea I don't want to deride it.