40 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined 16 Sep \ parent \ on: Sahkaan Wahlook AMA lol
acknowledgement that someone took the time and effort to post or reply to them
This is something we probably need to reconcile with the rewards system a little better.
write
preview
45 sats \ 4 replies \ @grayruby 16 Sep
Yes, but it is a hard problem because to his point you don't want people just posting drivel to get volume numbers and just zapping everything. I understand the complexity of the problem which I why I haven't suggest the algo be changed. You guys are smarter than me. If you can figure out a way to improve it while still providing the same spam resistance I think I would be in favour.
reply
40 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 16 Sep
The only answer that comes to mind is to stop zapping out of courtesy.
Although, it may be a solution in search of a problem. K00b told me that most of the long time stackers have almost perfect trust scores, which is the mechanism that would be the issue with courtesy zapping.
reply
45 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 16 Sep
Man, I want to learn what my trust score is. I wonder if it is low or high?
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 16 Sep
That's for k00b's eyes only.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 16 Sep
I think SN is still in its infancy stage. There is probably a solution, just might take time to figure out.
reply