pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 18 Sep 2024 \ parent \ on: Bitcoin Core App send prototype bitcoin
I see that this makes perfect sense. You think people shouldn't run Bitcoin Node anywhere. Since most wallets don't support SPV yet.
Why not make both apps available for the user to choose from? Or should we concentrate everything in one app?
I will repeat this over and over:
Bitcoin onchain: the vault, the holding, the final settlement, you use it mostly to open/close LN channels.
Bitcoin Lightning: the payment network.
Why would I load up on a mobile a full bitcoin node? That's stupid. I have desktop or RPi devices for that doing it much better.
On a mobile I would prioritize the use of LN, the payment network.
Since most wallets don't support SPV yet.
How many mobile wallets did you tried out? Electrum, Green, Bitkit, Phoenix, Bluewallet already use SPV. Then we have Zeus, Blixt, Breez using Neutrino. All these are doing much better use for onchain txs from a mobile (as i repeat, exclusively to open/close Ln channels).
If I run a bitcoin core app on a mobile with SPV, only capable of doing onchain txs, there's NO POINT in using it. Is totally useless.
If I run a bitcoin core with full blocks on a mobile it will kill it. Totally pointless.
reply
Why would I load up on a mobile a full bitcoin node?
Some people wish this app and idea. Do you want to control the desire of people?
IMO, let market decides.
Bitcoin onchain: the vault, the holding, the final settlement, you use it mostly to open/close LN channels. Bitcoin Lightning: the payment network.
Everyone knows :)
reply
reply