Getting zapped is nerfed, while rewards are powered up.
I'm excited to see how it plays out. That 30% cut is probably going to make it so we stop using zaps for our various pools, which is a little disappointing.
Yes, that's a valid point. Maybe the president doesn't like pools.
reply
34 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 6h
We'd need a zap that doesn't affect ranking so people can pay each other with zaps as if you would when using their lightning address.
reply
1232 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner 6h
A zap button on our profile solves that.
reply
129 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 6h
👀
Maybe we need to overhaul the lightning address button in every profile. It currently only shows a QR code on press so you can pay using LNURL. It should give more options.
reply
Yes. I think that's important.
reply
Yeah, for the survivor pools and such that's gonna be interesting. I've added 2k to 5k sats to pools I don't even particularly take part of. What's a work around do you think for the pools and such, which I think are one of the aspects of the community I enjoy the most!
reply
We'll just have to do lightning invoices and then trust whoever's running the pool to do the accounting honestly.
reply
I agree but also hate that "trust" haha. The NFL Survivor pool is like 350k sats.
reply
38 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 5h
We can start using ecash for these pools, so at least the rug pull will be indiscriminate 👀
reply
Either way we're trusting the person to actually pay out. The only real difference would be a lack of transparency about how large the pool is.
reply
True true. I suppose I had wishful thinking, but I also trust GrayRuby as he has incentives by owning the sports territory. Uneducated question, would DLCs or Cashu/Fedi mints be a solution in the future for something like a trust less pool? I'm not too familiar with either however.
reply
No idea. I think reputation can handle this for the foreseeable future.
reply
Yeah. 30% cut on 10k buy in is a bit too much. We will just find another way.
reply