pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @moneroshill 14 Sep 2022 \ parent \ on: Lightning network centralization metrics bitcoin
I pointed to hard facts. It's you who is competing fact with fiction.
You have pointed to a casual observation that fees have decreased since implementation of LN, and extrapolated that forever.
This all is just in your head - fiction. Try more then double. As I said, keep up because you're losing your argument really badly.
It is still insufficient. Blocksize needs to increase by an order of magnetude.
Satoshi intended Bitcoin to be trackable back to the Genesis Block, your shitcoin isn't. Satoshi intended Bitcoin to have a cap on supply, your shitcoin doesn't have.
This is a cope. Satoshi intended bitcoin to implement privacy features:
https://preview.redd.it/40zi1zi22ks61.png?width=1080&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=33a8f9d0ff6f753c0e9762d6ba031622fce143b2
write
preview
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @HODL 14 Sep 2022
You have pointed to a casual observation that fees have decreased since implementation of LN, and extrapolated that forever.
Pointed to the past - the only facts we have. You're predicting the future - fiction made in your head.
It is still insufficient. Blocksize needs to increase by an order of magnetude.
LOL. Is it you Craig? Go back to your gigamegs and 20 nodes, please. We like Bitcoin to be decentralised.
This is a cope.
You're a cope. You're the one that hates Bitcoin & LN, while using both to market your dying shitcoin.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @moneroshill 14 Sep 2022
Pointed to the past - the only facts we have. You're predicting the future - fiction made in your head.
https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/extrapolating.png
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @HODL 15 Sep 2022
That's exactly what you do, except you ignore the past (facts) to fit your narrative.
Like a proper troll.
reply