pull down to refresh
100 sats \ 10 replies \ @HODL 14 Sep 2022 \ parent \ on: Lightning network centralization metrics bitcoin
I pointed to hard facts. It's you who is competing fact with fiction.
Exactly! That's what you think - more fiction. The fact (something you keep missing) is, at least one hard-fork is planned for the future because we all know it's necessary.
This all is just in your head - fiction. Try more then double. As I said, keep up because you're losing your argument really badly.
Just in your head - fiction. The fact is, you choose to use Bitcoin just to be here.
More fiction, lol. No, Satoshi intended Bitcoin to be trackable back to the Genesis Block, your shitcoin isn't. Satoshi intended Bitcoin to have a cap on supply, your shitcoin doesn't have.
Asked three times, answer please. Are you a troll?
Or just another shill, using Bitcoin and its community to market the dying shitcoin?
at least one hard-fork is planned for the future because we all know it's necessary.
I guess I'm outside the subset of "we all".. so please enlighten me: what hard-fork is necessary? All I can think of is either a) changing the core crypto to be quantum resistant or b) something to do with the 2038 problem
reply
That's the one - 2038 which we're fine until (I believe) year 2106. If there will be a hardfork to fix that, we might bundle more things into it. Cutting satoshi into another 100 million bits could be another one. That would also make new halvings possible - half sat per block, followed by a quarter of sat for years later and so on (21 million would still be intact in this case). Quantum resistance, larger block space and whatever necessary might find its way into that single hardfork too.
I don't pretend to see the future, just thinking of the possibilities. Some shitcoiners don't realise that never is a really long period of time.
reply
If it takes 16 years for bitcoin to be upgraded, then it is futile. I suspect most interest in bitcoin will have largely vanished by then. Bitcoin is only like 13 years old so far.
reply
Bitcoin was upgraded a few months ago - in April 2022. The previous upgrade was in September 2021.
Where exactly have you pulled the 16 years from?? Is it the same place the rest of your predictions are coming from?
Stop trolling and get learn the facts, please.
reply
"Network Upgrade" is synonymous with "Hard Fork"
reply
Again. That's just in your head - fiction.
You can find hundreds more links, each will explain that ANY implemented BIP is an upgrade.
Stop trolling and get learn the facts, please.
reply
I pointed to hard facts. It's you who is competing fact with fiction.
You have pointed to a casual observation that fees have decreased since implementation of LN, and extrapolated that forever.
This all is just in your head - fiction. Try more then double. As I said, keep up because you're losing your argument really badly.
It is still insufficient. Blocksize needs to increase by an order of magnetude.
Satoshi intended Bitcoin to be trackable back to the Genesis Block, your shitcoin isn't. Satoshi intended Bitcoin to have a cap on supply, your shitcoin doesn't have.
This is a cope. Satoshi intended bitcoin to implement privacy features:
reply
You have pointed to a casual observation that fees have decreased since implementation of LN, and extrapolated that forever.
Pointed to the past - the only facts we have. You're predicting the future - fiction made in your head.
It is still insufficient. Blocksize needs to increase by an order of magnetude.
LOL. Is it you Craig? Go back to your gigamegs and 20 nodes, please. We like Bitcoin to be decentralised.
This is a cope.
You're a cope. You're the one that hates Bitcoin & LN, while using both to market your dying shitcoin.
reply
Pointed to the past - the only facts we have. You're predicting the future - fiction made in your head.
reply
That's exactly what you do, except you ignore the past (facts) to fit your narrative.
Like a proper troll.
reply