I've been doing a lot of Bitcoin reading lately including some books you've listed here. Also intend to write reviews so I can cement some of the ideas into my mind and understand them better.

Meta question: what do you think makes a "good" review? And why do you think yours feel short?

I can see them going in 2 directions, one being more of a condensed summary of the content, another being a more "literary" classic book review style which is more big picture and piques readers' curiosity to pick up the book.

I guess there are a thousand formats this could take really.