131 sats \ 2 replies \ @Satosora 2 Oct \ on: ‘In awe’: scientists impressed by latest ChatGPT model o1 science
It worked because the ai had a base to start from. Its not like it did all the calculations without guidance.
write
preview
62 sats \ 1 reply \ @south_korea_ln OP 2 Oct
The PhDs they compare it with also have a base to start from, yet ChatGPT o1 outperforms them. The article adds nuance to this and the original cited statement so it's worth reading the actual article.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 2 Oct
They are also comparing how the ai does against each previous model. Of course it would be better.
reply