pull down to refresh
61 sats \ 27 replies \ @siggy47 9 Oct \ parent \ on: Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery | Movie Review movies
Nice catch! Somebody's paying attention. It had the earmarks: "unless you're living under a rock", "how'd the film do? ", " "decidedly mid".
Maybe this would be a good idea for an SN bot. Scans every article and indicates the level of AI-ness if above a certain threshold (to avoid spam).
reply
Good idea. This sounds like a job for @ek
reply
I was already looking for a public API for exactly that haha. Maybe I could use this one.
reply
Zerogpt is lame. I'll pay for originality which also checks for plagiarism. How it scored this post:
This is a good one. I also verify articles there.
reply
I feel the need to defend myself to everyone in this thread. Here is the analysis by GPTZero:
I did not use AI for this, nor have I ever used AI to write on SN. You can check my post history to verify.
It took me about an hour to write the review. I wrote it from about midnight to 1am, 10/9, pacific time.
reply
reply
Yeah, didn't strike me as AI either.
The language I (have to) use in scientific articles often matches quite well with what ChatGPT outputs. Say I write my abstract and ask ChatGPT to improve on it, it uses quite similar expressions and vocabulary. It just improves my flow which isn't always perfect as a non-native speaker.
reply
I've been trained like a Pavlovian dog to use neutral, hedged language, because if you use stronger language in an academic article referees will usually attack you.
Like if you say, "This evidence proves..." you will get attacked endlessly. If you say, "This evidence is consistent with... " then you get a pass.
(For economics, where evidence is often suggestive at best.)
Initial 2 paragraphs are 100% and the rest of the article is well edited after generating through AI.
reply
Ran it through Quillbot, got 0%. Not sure what the standard is nowadays for AI detection though.
reply
It took me about an hour to write the review. I wrote it from about midnight to 1am, 10/9, pacific time.
This makes me wonder how can someone be so superfast. You're too fast. 1 hour and more than 5000 words. What a Speedster!
reply
English is my first language and i do a lot of writing in my job. (I work as a university professor)
reply
So, you mean to say you can keep on writing so efficiently without breaking the speed of 50 words a minute.
You're a GOAT writer.
Not sure how accurate these tools are. One that works on one model will likely not work for a newer iteration. False positives probably occur too. There should be some literature on this.
By design, this will be kind of an arms-race...
reply
If it's an idea it's better to implement it asap.
I'm just thinking what about someone who was just going to write an article. He certainly won't get the the first mover advantage because AI had already done it and it went viral as well.
reply
That being said, I don't mind if someone who is not fluent in English first writes the article himself/herself and then uses AI to polish it (a bit). But it definitely loses authenticity.
This more as a general comment, don't know about the specifics here.
reply
I personally feel bad to read AI generated articles. I can catch them with a high accuracy because I used to edit article submission to an Indian Platform for local news.
reply
I ran the whole thing through a detector. It did highlight those parts, funnily enough. But it gave the overall text only a 28%.
I didn't use AI to write this, not even one sentence.
reply