Now The New Yorker is weighing in. I knew the article would be long and biased. I never trusted the whole "there's no such thing as bad publicity" thing, but in the end it's all just noise.
pull down to refresh
pull down to refresh
Now The New Yorker is weighing in. I knew the article would be long and biased. I never trusted the whole "there's no such thing as bad publicity" thing, but in the end it's all just noise.
It’s all noise . We are all Satoshi
Yes? You called? 😁
How are you
Just swell. And you?
Fantastic. Pouring rain 🌧️ here currently
Finally somthing with the substance!
I think if we keep on posting for Satoshi's identity article in such a large number, he'll be compelled to show up here on SN.
But but but... Now it's on HBO!?
I'm gonna go balance my channels.
good one! I don't believe in balancing though, it's just not worth it.
In the brief time I've run my little node. I have to agree with you.
But I couldn't resist.
New Yorker runs out of ideas so they must "improvise". Tomorrow they will discover who killed Kennedy... Low rating is a b.i.a.t.c.h...lol
Everything coming from the Establishment is nothing but dross. I don’t think we will ever know for sure who the inventor was. Perhaps the inventor was a whole large crew of people working on a secret Manhattan like project which will not be de-classified for the next 75 years (you know, just like Pfizer and the jab).
Every time this happens, its just noise.
Because the person is so wealthy and a mystery.
I feel like every year they come up with someone new.
Even if this is true, no one will believe it.
Never, he will.
Claims will always arise, but Satoshi will always remain unknown.