To Beat the State, We Must Replace It \ stacker news ~Politics_And

pull down to refresh

To Beat the State, We Must Replace It odysee.com/@mises:1/to-beat-the-state%2C-we-must-replace-it-2:e?r=8T2xqWjtafHWYGxQBSsrbw1wQPm7sWRq

152 sats \ 5 comments \ @Undisciplined 10 Oct Politics_And_Law

From Radio Rothbard

We must first build institutions that can replace the state. Institutions like families, churches, and schools.

Unfortunately, the Mises folks are still missing the Bitcoin Revolution occurring right under their noses.

view all related items

37 sats \ 1 reply \ @7e6e393a56 11 Oct

I've heard some libertarians criticize bitcoin, for example, defending the stock market like any liberal. I don't understand this? Where is the coherence?

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 11 Oct

There are a lot of libertarians who are stuck in the regime's Cult of Respectability. Their principles are generally correct, but they buy into the mainstream framing of everything.

Then there are the goldbug libertarians who have yet to recognize why bitcoin has superior monetary potential.

25 sats \ 2 replies \ @Msd0457890 10 Oct

We have always been taught that the state is always the manager or the one who governs, but those of us who have awakened know that they have always done their job poorly.

20 sats \ 0 replies \ @028559d218 10 Oct

Think about this, and ask the question: Why should the State have complete and total control over the money supply?

The United States is based on the idea of checks and balances, decentralization, and Justice for all. If that's true... where is the private sector money? Why should 'the state', the powers that be, control the money supply and interest rates? Shouldn't there be money, savings, and capital outside of state control that exists completely based on the free market?

We don't want 'the state' have monopolistic control over how a business is run? Why do we allow the state to have control over how 'money is run'?

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @jerrybature 10 Oct

Absolutely!