pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 11 Oct \ parent \ on: The Manifestation of Economic Laws Across Societies and Epochs econ
My sense was that China ran out of market reforms that wouldn't cut into some crony's racket.
I agree with you that they'll need a change from the top, in order to advance their economy further.
I think the change is coming from the bottom up this time because the people are not going to take it any longer. This time the general population, with their real estate investments will be the ones to suffer heavily, and, consequently be the most pissed off. I think that even this time they will be pissed off enough to ignore the higher ups. They also have the slight problem of an imbalanced population, I believe it is about 60% male and 40% female at this point in the younger generations due to the one-child policy of the past.
reply
The number of young men lacking viable opportunities is a very significant problem for them. My expectation is that they are aware of this problem and it will be part of the reason for top-down changes.
I haven't sensed any revolutionary spirit from the Chinese people I know.
reply
Not sensing the spirit is a huge thing. However, I think that the population imbalance will be settled on the shores of Taiwan, the Philippines and other China Sea nations, no matter what we like. It is baked into the cake by the globalist hacks.
reply
I hope not, but they certainly wouldn't be the first to solve an idle young men problem that way.
I'd say there's a decent chance they do something like the New Deal and deploy those idle young men on remote public works projects.
reply
Yep, they could put them to work on the new Silk Road. There is a lot of work to be done on it, but, the locals don’t always appreciate having Chinese relocate to their country. Malaysia comes to mind, right off hand.
reply
There's a lot of middle of nowhere to have them work, too.
reply
Yes, many deserts and jungles for the to get lost in when they aren’t working under a communist lash!
reply