pull down to refresh
67 sats \ 6 replies \ @IamSINGLE 18 Oct \ parent \ on: Zapping More Might Solve Our Leader Board Wizard Issue meta
Have you seen 1 Sat zap to many post by someone? That was just ridiculous!
The postive effect as I already said is we're getting almost every post zapped. Zapping is done on more posts now than it was done before. I think now when everyone knows it more Stackers are trying it and not to mention some who pretend to be 'Haters' of this trend have been doing it.
I strongly believe that there's no need to overstress 'the early zapping does this or that'. Why I'm saying this because I haven't seen more than a couple of instances where it was indicative of 'a gamer sitting in top 10 of the leaderboard'.
It may also be that to whom we're looking as gamer has been on the top ranks for more than one reason. The reason might be that he zapped only top posts (not a single post or comment) and yes before others.
This leads me to a question.
Does zapping some low quality content lowers your leaderboard rank?
Does zapping some low quality content lowers your leaderboard rank?
No, it just doesn't help.
I don't worry about this early zap gaming either, but I wanted to let those who are bothered by it know that if they zap posts more then it will be less pronounced.
reply
I see.
What would you like zaps or sats? I know you'll say zaps.
If 100 stackers zap 10 sats, it still is thousand but sometimes Stackers starting with a 1000 sats.
Overall, I'm enjoying all these talks in the threads and learning on the way.
reply
I want thoughtful comments. The sats and zaps are much appreciated, but I'm here because there are thoughtful people to talk to.
reply
Hahah @Coinsreporter wisely remaining quiet in this whole thread.
reply
reply
Was Coins the wizard?
reply