pull down to refresh

What's is about (short version)? Russia. Rocky 4: The Early Years.
What's it about (long version)? Anthony Beevor's ‘Russia: Revolution and Civil War 1917-1921’ looks at the complex history of Russia at one of the most significant periods of world history.
Perhaps this in unlikely to be of much interest at SN however the effect of this period of history is still being felt to this day. Indeed a political and ruling elite, indifferent to an impoverished underclass, torn from power and the inhumanity it unleashes serve as a chilling warning from the past.
One of the strengths of the book is the authors ability to weave together various elements of Russian revolutionary history, where events are set in context and less known historical / infamous figures are brought to life, making the story accessible to everyday readers (like me).
Beevor's sources and references give his work credibility and if you have read his other work (ie Berlin, Stalingrad and The Spanish Civil War) you will have an idea of his style. It also gives a little heard insight into the experiences of normal Russian citizen throughout this time and some of the stories are harrowing, cruel and frequently tragic.
As is to be expected there is the occasional dance over the complexity (and contradictions) that characterize this period. The 'set up' for the revolution and the Tsars role is certainly worth reading as is the later section on the the Siberian March. That pre-revolutionary Russia was an Imperial power among other powers is not mentioned, nor its connectedness to Europe, although there is coverage of its interactions with China and Japan.
Also, the lack of depth about more famous individuals and groups (including the Bolshevik Party hierarchy, Mensheviks, various Cossacks groupings, Czech and Polish Brigades) can lead to misinterpretations, particularly regarding their motivations and I found myself checking other sources to be reminded of details. Trotsky and Lenin feel like footnotes rather than key instruments.
Whilst the timeline is progressive, the geography is less clear (it would help to have a general as well as the specific maps provided at the start of each chapter to highlight the area of interest) and the interconnections among various events and locations could be better presented. The locations and role of Allied forces from post-WW1 Europe & America could certainly be better highlighted, longer and should be discussed.
I try to remember that it is a history book focused on politics and the glimpses he provides of cultural and intellectural life only hint at a deeper story to be told. Certainly the influence on Russian writers like Nabokov and the other emigres are mentioned but not elaborated on and left me wanting more.
It is an informative work that succeeds in many respects, particularly its narrative style and sheer depth of a short but impactful time in history but but it can feel turgid, complex and confusing. I can imagine it sits between scholars who may be underwhelmed by its coverage and some general readers overwhelmed by its detail. Ultimately, while Beevor’s narrative is engaging, it may leave some yearning for a deeper, more specific, dive in their area of interest.
I was left feeling at times that's Boris Pasternak's novel 'Doctor Zhivago' covered some areas better.
5/10
sweet, man -- keep 'em coming!
I love these short recaps of books I would never pick up/read on my own
reply
Thank you!
reply
The revolution happened after the Czar denying the stablishment of a central bank in Russia by european banksters, but it was just a coincidence.
reply
Thanks for posting. I have such limited knowledge of this history and I want to read more. Maybe I won't pick this book, though, I guess. I'm fascinated by both the bolshevik revolution and the Chinese revolution. Last year I read Mao, The Unknown Story, which was pretty good.
reply
Have you ever read Wild Swans? She also wrote Mao, The Unknown Story. Wild Swans is the story of the 20th century in China, through the lens of 3 women, grandmother, mother, and daughter. The daughter is the author, Jung Chang.
It's an amazing book, one of my favorites. Chinese history of this period will really stick with you after reading it.
reply
No, but that sounds like a good one! I'm going to check it out now. I really enjoyed the Mao book. I had no sense of him as a person and I certainly do now.
reply
Nice recommendation - thank you. I have heard of it but not read it.
reply
Thank you - I wouldn’t recommend this one. I really don't know much about the Chinese revolution if I’m honest.
I must admit I find it a fascinating period of history. You could probably just watch the film Nicholas & Alexandria (featuring an amazing turn by Tom Baker as Rasputin) or (my preferred) David Lean’s Dr Zhivago and get a solid feel for the period.
reply
I got totally into Dr Zhivago movie two years ago. I watched it twice. It's funny, because my parents made me sit through it when I was a kid and I found it unbearable.
reply
It’s definitely better watched as an adult - slow burn - quite typical for David Lean.
I hope you followed it with Lawrence of Arabia. And Bridge Over The River Kwai. And maybe the 1946 Great Expectations…
reply
My father and I watched Bridge Over River Kwai many times before he passed. A family tradition. I just rewatched Lawrence Of Arabia about six months ago. I have not seen the 1946 Great Expectations, but of course loved the book.
reply
It’s a very faithful retelling with an Alex Guinness cameo (again) and the wonderful John Mills as Pip. (He must have made Scott of the Antarctic around the same time i’m guessing)
Typical Carlos-Siggy conversation and strayed far, far away from the original topic.
PS anniversary of Keroauc’s death in 1969 yesterday. So many years ago…
reply
I know about Kerouac. My mom died on the same day 3 years ago.
reply
Oh man I’m sorry. That’s a painful personal reminder.
I just adore the way you read. the occasional dance, footnotes rather than key instruments Delicious phrases 🤤
Here, I thought you balanced an objective critique with your personal perspective well. More, please
reply
Thank you so much - I truly value your feedback.
Unfortunately, my standard of written English and ability to communicate is quite poor, so I hope the practice of writing these is benefiting both myself and others. I try and write how I might present to an interested audience but I don’t always feel I succeed.
This is not helped that I recently lost the majority use of my hands and typing has become a real struggle. Haiku and long form poetry, mediums I enjoy greatly, require many rewrites and sadly speech recognition isn’t great for that.
reply
Over the last year, I have been focusing on understanding this historical period, researching reliable sources on the topic. Look for Marc Ferro, a French writer who was not a communist. It contains a wealth of details that are surprising.
reply
Will do - thank you!
reply