pull down to refresh

The YouTube Algo spit out this gem and I’m curious are these two men credible?

I never heard of Rich Baris so I don’t have any basis to judge him on. It appears he’s bias towards the Republicans but is he more spin than facts? I’m not sure.

Robert Barnes I know a bit better. I first caught wind of him when he started going on George Gammon’s YouTube channel. During his interviews with George I thought he had outstanding credibility. Everything he spoke about seemed to make logical sense.

Then Barnes and Gammon came up with this “brilliant” idea to sue the Fed. Gammon used his followers to raise the funds. This was maybe 2 or 3 years ago they started this endeavor. I haven’t followed the efforts of this for quite some time but I’m getting the sense that it was a scam to fill Barnes’s coffers.
AKA The lawyer hustle. Let’s get a bunch of YouTube viewers to give me money to pursue a case that will never bear any tangible results but keeps Barnes and his employees with billable hours.

I see this type of behavior amongst civil engineering firms all the time. They come to a rural town to sell them on this highly sophisticated water/sewer treatment plant charge the town their expensive design fee then walk away knowing damn well they set up this community for failure.

Two reasons why I find this type of civil engineering design hustle despicable:

  1. The design is so expensive the rural poor town will never find the resources to build such design. If they do it will be some USDA loan with a low interest rate with a 40 year pay back period. So the fee they paid was a waste as the design will never get constructed.
  2. If the town does find the capital to build the project the operation and maintenance for the sophisticated plant with be a nightmare. None of the locals will have the experience or training to operate it. Thus they have to hire a third party which will be a drain on local resources.

I question them because they are commenting on the upcoming election and the feels a bit scammy to me.

In the map below they a predicting a landslide win for Trump.

312-191 l

Which seems utterly ridiculous to me. I’m not pro Trump or Kamala but I wonder if these guys are just in on the hustle. Telling people what they want to hear so they can get clicks and grow their influence. If they are they are no better than mainstream media.

Credibility depends on the context—Barnes and Baris have expertise, but they’re not immune to mistakes.

Both are conservatives

Rich is a pollster

Trump sells out Madison square garden 9 days before Election Day

312 electoral votes is possible for Trump. He won 306 in 2016.

reply

What about in 2020?

reply

Biden received 306
Trump 232

Betting markets favor Trump also

Trump is also polling better than in 2020 or 2016

Look at the early voting results in Pennsylvania and Georgia and North Carolina and Nevada

reply

A lot of sats can be made if Kamala upsets

reply

https://polymarket.com/event/presidential-election-winner-2024

880 million bet on Trump
556 million bet on Kamala

Polymarket is a betting market not a bookmaker similar to PredictIt.

https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7456/Who-will-win-the-2024-US-presidential-election

what is your non 'ridiculous' prediction?
how many electoral votes for the winner?

Whoever wins PA will gain a majority in electoral college

reply

Trump has 301.
If he wins Arizona his total is 312

Utterly ridiculous

reply

Well now that the election is all but over they may have nailed it. Trump is on pace to win 312 electoral votes.

reply