211 sats \ 8 replies \ @south_korea_ln 30 Oct \ on: Parents’ Corner: 2am delusions with @k00b alter_native
I know you're probably tongue in cheek. But i don't think turning up the rewards towards the territory owners once more would be justifiable. I want to have something that is long term sustainable. For that, one needs more users. And users probably can stomach a 30% cut on their zaps, but it would start to feel like rent seeking if at every 10 sat zap i receive as a user, 5 sats are taken by the overlords ;)
Maybe i completely missed your point ;)
reply
Ha I was just having fun. But sometimes there is truth in delusions
reply
As someone receiving the zaps I definitely feel it when my attached wallet shows only 7 or 70 sats received!
I agree 30% is probably the highest to go.
SN is like Bitcoin all about balanced incentives!
reply
As a territory owner, I am delighted by the new 30%. I finally felt like it would be possible, at some point in the future, not to run it at a loss anymore. But yeah, as I said, more is too much.
reply
Which territory is yours?
reply
You can just click on a user name to check one's territories. Mine is ~science.
reply
Looks popular! I still haven’t been 😅
But I will soon 🫡
reply
We're having a lot of fun with some math puzzles these days...
I'll see you there, dog :)
reply