pull down to refresh

Firearm registration is a violation of property rights?

Yes, Who the hell are they to require that of someone?

reply

I think a lot of firearms arent registered.
Grandfathered into the system.

reply

There are also just a ton of black market guns.

reply

Isnt everything that isnt registered to the state considered black market? Lol

reply

Only in states that require registration. In civilized states, that don't require registration, those guns are no more "black market" than your unregistered tomatoes.

Technically, many "black market" guns are "grey market" guns. Agorists make a distinction between items prohibited by the state (black market) and items the state issues licenses for. Doing otherwise legal things without complying with licensing requirements is considered "grey market" activity.

reply

You might argue semantics, but you know what l say is true.

reply

Usually, black market is the market in goods that would otherwise be bearing a heavy tax.
An example would have been salt in India and tobacco around the world.
(BTW, nicotine kills all [as in every] virus known to exist. Maybe this is why they tax and discourage the use of nicotine products like tobacco, tomatoes and eggplants.)

reply

unregistered firearms are "black market", deserve punishment for dishonor.

arms are just on the market, not the "white" one, the real market

reply

I am not saying it is right.
Just what l believe the state thinks.

reply

All good.
The state cannot think, it dosn't have a brain, lol
Can be sure that men in crucial postitions know the difference between arms and firearms

reply

No, but the petty tyrants that collectively call themselves the state do have brains, although, somewhat mushy and dishonest.

I suspect that you are saying unregistered firearms that are also stolen or otherwise not the property of the seller are the ones that are dishonored. Is that correct?
I thought that all free markets were considered “black markets” if they sold “unapproved” goods.

reply

sovereigns have the right to bear arms, not firearms

there is no law/act/statute to register an arm

it's a language trick, like with human rights, to change the legal meaning of words

the market is free, color of market is another language trick

https://www.epi.org/publication/the-color-of-law-a-forgotten-history-of-how-our-government-segregated-america/

reply

The question you have to ask now is, “Who is playing these language and lawful or legal tricks?”
We already know the WHY of this situation.
We just have to know who is who and in what relationship.

Maybe, free market?

reply

There are also the “self-made” variety, with no serial numbers.
They come in a wide variety.

reply

The ones with the guns to your head?
Funny what one will do when you are over the barrel.
Well, actually, tragic.

reply

Arms don't need registration

reply
reply

It went to the uae, right?
How did they even find a meteorite that didnt have any imperfections?
Seems fake.
Or maybe just for decoration?

reply

That's actually pretty common. The earliest iron working that we know of used meteorites, because they're pure enough to work without needing advanced metallurgy.

reply

Did a pharaoh have a dagger made out of meteorite?

reply
reply

The first iron weapons were forged in the Bronze Age and clove those bronze swords asunder in battle.
One of the first steps in the arms race.

reply

If we think about history, people were really dumb those times, killing each others for all kind of stupid things.

You are right.
They do not need be registered.
Except Bruce Lee.

reply

What a slave :)

reply