pull down to refresh

As the presidency assumes ever more power, it becomes less and less accountable and more and more tyrannical. These days, when we say “the federal government,” what we really mean is the presidency. When we say “national priorities,” we really mean what the presidency wants. When we say “national culture,” we mean what the presidency funds and imposes.
But this tactic doesn’t work like it once did. Americans took from Watergate the lesson that presidents will lie to you. Few voters now expect honesty, integrity, or even decency from their presidents. Many vote simply in the hope that their favored candidate will be less awful than the other one. Most know that under our current regime of untrammeled executive power, we can’t expect any better.
And here we are, once again, deciding on who will be our overlord, once again. Will we never learn?
It actually seems more like "the federal government" has come to mean the unelected bureaucracy. That's mostly under the executive branch, but it isn't particularly responsive to the president.
Hence Woods' Law:
No matter who you vote for, you get John McCain.
reply
The only thing that makes sure that current administration policy is NOT followed is the civil service laws. Cut them and make all the jobs of the federal government spoils of the victor and you would see policy being followed. Sound radical, change my mind.
McCain was a POS. I know, I was at a convention where, despite popular demand for Paul, he was shoehorned into the winner’s circle.
reply
I was at a convention where, despite popular demand for Paul, he was shoehorned into the winner’s circle.
That happened at the convention my dad was involved in too.
I agree about the civil service protections, but it's hard to imagine them going anywhere.
reply
That would need a law change by congress. I am happy for the filibuster being in place, still, but getting over 60 votes for it would be nearly impossible. After all, that is where the institutional power now lies and lies and lies.
reply