reply on: I'd Like Some Input On A Possible Logo \ stacker news ~Design

pull down to refresh

1151 sats \ 14 replies \ @cryotosensei 9 Nov \ parent \ on: I'd Like Some Input On A Possible Logo Design

I wasn’t a fan of Fab’s Fabrics because I found the apostrophe distracting. But I could get onboard with Fabs Fabrics. I like alliteration. And fabs serves as a pun for fabulous. I like the multilayered meaning it conjures

9 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs OP 9 Nov

I like alliteration. And fabs serves as a pun for fabulous. I like the multilayered meaning it conjures

Ha! Didn't think of it that way, solid.

24 sats \ 12 replies \ @Undisciplined 9 Nov

What if it was Fabs' Fabrics? Is that apostrophe less distracting?

16 sats \ 11 replies \ @cryotosensei 9 Nov

Yes to me. Because that ‘s’ is attached to fab and is no longer hanging in no man’s land

118 sats \ 7 replies \ @Undisciplined 9 Nov

Keeping the apostrophe might help balance out the character count of the two words, which might make logo design easier.

21 sats \ 5 replies \ @Fabs OP 9 Nov

You're pointing at the original, right?

81 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined 9 Nov

No, I'm thinking Fabs' Fabrics. That still indicates it's made by you.

43 sats \ 3 replies \ @Fabs OP 9 Nov

Ah, I'm no hero in anything grammatics, so there's that.

I can live with it either way, though.

33 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 9 Nov

Yes, afaik it still means you because it can mean that your nickname is "Fabs" which ends with "s". You don't put another "s" after an "s" to signal ownership, you just put the apostrophe.

49 sats \ 1 reply \ @cryotosensei 10 Nov

Yes, perfectly explained!

view replies

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @cryotosensei 10 Nov

I agree 💯 with you. The devil is in the details, huh

34 sats \ 2 replies \ @Fabs OP 9 Nov

But isn't "Fab's" indicating that it's made by me, c'est magnifique Fabs?!

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @cryotosensei 10 Nov

You are fabulous!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs OP 10 Nov

Aren't we all a bit Fabs every now and then?.. ❤️‍🔥