pull down to refresh
a sub sub space would probably look like user.bob@bitcoin
we wanted to avoid name collisions with traditional DNS which is why we chose this syntax
reply
what do you do for a sub sub space? user.subsubspace.subspace@space? the syntax just seems weird.
reply
do we even need sub sub spaces? what use cases do you have in mind?
with this syntax, is there a way to distinguish between a subspace that was delegated via the spaces protocol or inside a zonefile that has been attached to the space?
reply
yes checkout the current proposed draft https://github.com/spacesprotocol/sips/blob/main/sip-0002.mediawiki
but there are still going to be collisions with all TLD, right?
reply
sorry I mean we used this syntax to make it less confusing with any conflicts with other naming systems
reply
I agree this is an issue, but I don't know that I like the syntax you've chosen. Not sure what a good solution is though.
reply
can a space have a
.
in it's name?reply
no, it has the same rules as a traditional dns name
reply
since the inception of the internet no email addresses have been defined directly on the tld so practically no collisions sip-02 also attempts to make this as painless as possible to integrate even into mainstream resolvers
bob@bitcoin
,bob
is a subspace of the parent spacebitcoin
. What about sub-sub-spaces? What do those look like?