pull down to refresh
117 sats \ 1 reply \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 13 Nov 2024 \ parent \ on: RobertMaxwell’s dark legacy of peer review: time to stop a system that tramples? science
I don’t think one does qualify as a “single trusted editor”. The alternative may be something like PubMed for the other sciences. Where you can put out your findings, apparently without editing, and people can look at it themselves, using their own judgment. Then they can either try to duplicate the results or not, as they choose. This way we don’t have to wait for the old school to all die out before paradigm change.
Other sciences have arXiv...
arXiv is a free distribution service and an open-access archive for nearly 2.4 million scholarly articles in the fields of physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, electrical engineering and systems science, and economics. Materials on this site are not peer-reviewed by arXiv.
reply