pull down to refresh
136 sats \ 1 reply \ @xz 19 Nov \ on: Carbon emissions of writing and illustrating are lower for AI than for humans science
To extrapolate the notion further, would it not be correct to say that the logical conclusion is an automated planet of artificial intelligence would be less carbon intensive than a planet with human activity, or biological activity.
Sounds a bit bunk.
Yes, that seems to be the logical conclusion :)
reply