pull down to refresh
237 sats \ 8 replies \ @IamSINGLE 6 Dec \ on: I googled ass-milking so you don't have to meta
Alright!
I'm glad you found the meaning of it funny and serious at the same time. But SN should learn to differentiate between abuse and fun.
-
How was this comment funny?
-
Did I Post #795246 some shit?
-
If that was shit? why other people posting only links or funny things here isn't shit?
-
Were the two stackers who zapped this post ass-milkers? How am I supposed to know?
I'm sorry to say but this isn't free speech? This is the encroachment of it.
I think Darth was riffing on Jihan Wu's infamous tweet:
I won't make any call on what you posted. The sats tell the truth. It looks like your post got 241 sats. Is 241 sats shit?
For me, I care about how many sats I garner. Also the discussion is good. If there are people who say things I don't want to engage with, I just don't engage.
I enjoy SN because the moderation is achieved via a market with sats. It is far and away better than any other moderation mechanism.
reply
The sats tell the truth. It looks like your post got 241 sats. Is 241 sats shit?
Do not judge a post about how many sats got. That's misleading and can be easily manipulated, even that you can see how many stackers zapped that post.
I repeat: to have a better view and ranking, zaps/sats must be separated by the upvotes. Upvotes must have a high cost of sats also, in order to not be manipulated.
Assmilkers are creating multiple sockpuppets accounts and zap each others creating a false idea that a post was "upvoted" with more sats.
Don't let them fool your view... a post with 10k sats from just 2-3 stackers is not the same as a post with 1000k sats from 20 stackers.
reply
If there was a way for the zaps on a post to go to the SN community as a whole, wouldn't that solve the problem you are describing?
Obviously, this is what SN rewards are. Perhaps the Sybil fee is too low (maybe it should be 50% rather than 30%), but the point is that people who try to inflate their standing by sock-puppet zapping end up paying the SN community for the space they take up.
In your example of a 10k sat post from 2-3 users versus a 1k sat post from 20 users, the 10k sat post paid 3k to SN. Sure, it's not a huge sum, but it adds up. If they are only zapping themselves, they are gonna spend a lot doing it.
If you think rewards are broken, that's one thing. But if you want to turn content moderation into only upvotes, let's all just go to reddit and post lightning addresses in our bios for when people want to zap us.
I much prefer that money plays a role in content moderation rather than faceless god-mode moderators.
reply
This is SN pool rewards feeding the assmilking monkeys...
Many will feel hurt by these images, but this is the truth.
I much prefer that money plays a role in content moderation
Yes and is simple: make them pay, not to milk...
reply
I will gladly pay a fee to SN, but only to SN, for each post.
But I do not want to finance assmilkers. Assmilkers are exactly like people that "work" for a gov or are getting subsidies from a gov... aka paid by hard working class. And they never want to go to do something useful, they just suck over and over from the subsidies, even that is not too much. PARASITES.
But as usual those that point out what is wrong with society (aka SN) are viewed as the "enemies of the society" that only want to destroy SN... ofc they feel threaten because they cannot suck anymore from other's work.
reply
yes that is the original phrase.
reply
I'm listening and I get your point about moderation on SN. But this is different.
He said a lot of other things to me. It was just one off. He's doing this a lot often and certainly running this like a vendetta against me and a few others. What have we done except standing against his bullying new Stackers?
I made it clear here why this (even if it's a joke) unacceptable to me.
#795270
I don't want and I can't accept the same for him as well. This is totally against my understanding of morality.
Also, who's he to molest new people who aren't as intelligent as he's on SN?
I mostly post links on SN, not from starting, but I listened @k00b say SN is like a news aggregator and there are many others who post links on SN. Are they all assmilking, as he call it? If that's so, why don't he comment bad things on everyone's link posts?
fyi I've got the sats on the post much much later he posted the comment, and after I made my stand with the link to his comment. This is also not the first instance. Here are others which tells about his sinful mentality against me
Sorry, these are so many but certainly the one that I put as screenshot above is unacceptable to me.
And you know what I respected him and was defending him against someone just one day before he started his vandetta against me.
reply
hunting assmilkers and shitcoiners is a daily sport now on SN...
reply