A lot of internet "sleuthing," of course, finds the wrong people and gets the wrong folks harassed, arrested, and potentially injured. But it's still amazing to see so many of the usual suspects sit this one out.
pull down to refresh
316 sats \ 5 replies \ @grayruby 7 Dec
Seems hypocritical. Why is he any less of a victim than someone who wasn't a rich CEO? Sure, maybe he should have taken more precaution and had security with him especially if he had death threats in the past, but the guy had two kids. Those kids don't have a father now. I get people are frustrated with the health care system but where is the empathy for his family?
reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 8 Dec
This is my take
reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @RdioActiv 7 Dec
Commies gonna commie
reply
40 sats \ 2 replies \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears OP 7 Dec
Oh, no question. I do get that a lot of people can directly point to issues they've had with adverse health issues directly due to his company (and that likely includes deaths), but statistically, most of these folks weren't even likely with UHC.
reply
334 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 7 Dec
Yeah, no one likes insurance companies I get it. Not saying we need to have a state funeral for the guy. I think he probably should have had security considering previous death threats. I just don't get the notion of lets seek justice for some but not others. Some people were cheering this on online. Like, go touch grass people, or better yet see a psychiatrist. Haha
reply
61 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 8 Dec
Yeah it’s so strange they are going all out to catch this guy but watch a first 48 episode and when regular people get killed you be lucky if you get more than 2 or 4 people working your case.
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @justin_shocknet 7 Dec
It's amazing how people will tie themselves into pretzels just to deny the existence of spooks and make this out to be some ad-hoc vigilante occurrence
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Enemy_of_the_state 7 Dec
A spook would not have been so sloppy to show his face, use hardball ammo, and jam the gun. It’s hard for anyone with any training to intentionally screw up so many things.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @justin_shocknet 7 Dec
Who said he showed his face? there's some pic going around of a guy with a different backpack... no proof. Even if there was, spooks use life-like masks.
As for the gun use he used subsonic ammo and a silencer, subsonic ammo doesn't have enough pressure for semi-auto... he manually cycled, and had clearly trained given how fluid the motion was.
Amateur hour is a patsie in the afternoon dead or caught within hours, fact on the ground is that there's been shit for leads. The MSM framing everything as if it was vigilantism implies it was the exact opposite.
If it's over the top - > it's an op.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Enemy_of_the_state 7 Dec
The ball ammo though? And why not change out the recoil spring so it does function? Everything about this was amateur hour, except the can.
reply
218 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 7 Dec
What's wrong with ball ammo? the guy is dead isn't he? Actually, I think you'd want ball ammo in cold weather... HP's get caught in jackets to where I even have some fancy Hornaday rounds they fill the HP with nylon to prevent it... I doubt that comes it comes in subsonic.
I'm sure some retard on the internet with overpriced wad cutters knows better and thinks he should have made a custom load because reasons.
Turns out the most reliable option isn't the spring, but manually cycling, as he did effectively.
People just want to virtue signal vigilantism against the bourgeois insurance companies, and the MSM is happy to feed their delusions while denying the existence of spooks and giving themselves an excuse not to do real journalism.
FACT on the ground is this person got a silenced weapon, planned, drilled, and positioned, then executed the job and got away... he and whoever paid him probably aren't worried about some leftist MSM huffers calling him an amateur.
The question now isn't who killed the CEO, but rather what he was going to say at the investor meeting that he wasn't allowed to. Once we know that we'll find who paid for it.
reply