pull down to refresh
316 sats \ 5 replies \ @grayruby 7 Dec \ on: Why top internet sleuths won't help find the UnitedHealthcare CEO killer news
Seems hypocritical. Why is he any less of a victim than someone who wasn't a rich CEO? Sure, maybe he should have taken more precaution and had security with him especially if he had death threats in the past, but the guy had two kids. Those kids don't have a father now. I get people are frustrated with the health care system but where is the empathy for his family?
This is my take
reply
Commies gonna commie
reply
Oh, no question. I do get that a lot of people can directly point to issues they've had with adverse health issues directly due to his company (and that likely includes deaths), but statistically, most of these folks weren't even likely with UHC.
reply
Yeah, no one likes insurance companies I get it. Not saying we need to have a state funeral for the guy. I think he probably should have had security considering previous death threats. I just don't get the notion of lets seek justice for some but not others. Some people were cheering this on online. Like, go touch grass people, or better yet see a psychiatrist. Haha
reply
Yeah it’s so strange they are going all out to catch this guy but watch a first 48 episode and when regular people get killed you be lucky if you get more than 2 or 4 people working your case.
reply