pull down to refresh

We should start trolling them with AI replies
Maybe, just maybe
Do they even look at replies? I notice there are many that don’t answer replies. I think it might be another fruitless pursuit.
reply
Will that even help? The people who use ai are just trying to milk sats from this site, right?
reply
20 sats \ 12 replies \ @k00b 10 Dec
I'm not talking about on this site specifically. I run into tons of blogs and essays that are AI written.
reply
I have been seeing lots of summaries that are ai made. Can you imagine science journals amd research done with ai?
reply
20 sats \ 9 replies \ @k00b 10 Dec
Yeah I frequently spot it in preprints.
reply
A couple months ago I wasnt using an AI detector, but now I have to just to notice. Some things I can detect by how it reads. Its becoming more widely adopted. Do people really think no one will notice?
reply
30 sats \ 7 replies \ @k00b 10 Dec
It's occasionally hard to spot, but it mostly shows in writing that has words for the sake of having words.
I'm not sure they care if people notice. I think they think it improves their "brand" in aggregate to have the appearance of being a writer even if no one in their right mind would bother reading it.
reply
I think it would be a brand killer for both the author and the AI, if someone got caught using it. Trust factors would evaporate immediately!
reply
30 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 10 Dec
Trust probably does evaporate, so either they are stupid or they aren't looking for trust. They might be merely looking for attention.
Its so soulless. Eventually quality will always beat quantity.
reply
Even better, soulful writing beats soulless writing every time. I think most people can tell the difference when they read.
The replies and posts are AI written. Where do you see those?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 10 Dec
They wouldn't read those either.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 10 Dec
ready 2 deploy
ps. good job dropping rewards pool rewards size @anon approves
reply