pull down to refresh
33 sats \ 12 replies \ @k00b 10 Dec \ parent \ on: Bitcoin Value Drives SN Inflation And Trust-Score Difficulty meta
Trust is a distribution, ie assigned relative to other stackers, so it isn't effected by price.
Posting costs will likely remain high until we lower territory prices which I plan to do but need to finish some other work first. Is 1 sat for commenting prohibitively expensive?
I interpreted the question as: with higher bitcoin price, is the average daily amount of zaps lower?
(And is that somehow affecting the rankings, which I guess it wouldn't if it's proportional across all the stackers ' lower zapping behaviour)
reply
Yeah, I believe the idea is that trust is based on zapping the same things as other stackers, so if zapping becomes less frequent, then trust scores will grow more slowly.
reply
in fairness I did mean zap value but thinking about your answer, what you say makes sense.
reply
Ok, you should have meant what I thought you meant. I recall k00b saying that zap size doesn't factor into trust scores.
reply
reply
reply
I'm planning to increase the
once
price while decreasing monthly
and yearly
. The once
founders mostly end up squatting on their territories ... so we either increase or remove the option (if we do remove it, current once
founders will be grandfathered).For monthly and yearly, whenever I make the switch I will prorate a refund.
so it isn't effected by price.
and zap value ?
Is 1 sat for commenting prohibitively expensive?
of course not. I was thinking more about post cost in some territories and especially rent territories price.