pull down to refresh
881 sats \ 11 replies \ @anon 14 Dec 2024 \ on: Paul Sztorc on Activating Drivechains via CUSF (Bitcoin Takeover S15 E68) bitcoin
@psztorc has lost all credibility to me ever since I hard him being disingenuous when discussing proposals other than Drivechains. If he's dishonest about competing proposals, how can I trust him when discussing his own stuff?
Why are you anon, genuinely curious
reply
Core and small blockers have lost credibility after doing nothing for 10+ years and wasting time and resources on bullshit like lightning.
reply
100k There's obvious value.
reply
measuing your success in FIAT
is NOT
Bitcoin
Notice Gold is at ATH's too.
reply
Wow, omega bait huh? Can't believe that's actually your opinion, because if it is then you are really misinformed, in any case this type of flame war is not really welcome.
How about we have a constructive debate instead? Something that doesn't entail calling the work of lots of people 'nothing' or 'bullshit'.
reply
this kind of concern trolling along with a censorship campaing is why bitcoin has lost 49% + share to shitcoins.
reply
of course, it has nothing to do with them wanting to play satoshi and eventually disappear with people's money lmao
reply
Lightning sucks, doesn't scale to 8 billion people. Is terribly and overly designed with game theory that does not work.
Recent bugs and revelations about these bugs lead to persecution from the community, so the lightning dev culture is broken and waiting to lose A LOT of peoples money.
Some shitcoins might have value, only time will tell, all plants need fertilizer.
the one attitude that is guaranteed to fail over time is the toxic maximalist
who represent an species over specialization (think dodo's) sensitive to heretofore unseen ecological changes
For example, if quantum computing is actually being used right now and has been for years by and against secret agencies, we the public would be the last to know. Meaning all our bitcoin was vulnerable this whole time.
This is what happens in a centralized dictatorship, it over specializes and collapses on its weak points.
If however bitcoin had been more pluralistic, embraced big/dynamic blocks and other changes, or at a minimum BIP 300/1 such that core could remain the same but allow for opt-in experimentation, all the shitcoin development and some few actual technologicaly interesting advancements such as zk-proofs would have happend on Bitcoin (a good thing because shitcoins are, remember, fertilizer) including perhaps tokenized experiments in Quatum resistance.
ALL while paying bitcoin fees and supporting the network.
The market would have rewarded those who chose to invest in those experiments.
But no. Because Bitcoin maxi's are communists we are all at risk of unseen black swans at the same time.
reply
When have they lost credibility?
reply
lightning is amazing?
reply
if you are a masochist i guess
reply