pull down to refresh

Bitcoin12.5%
Sats33.3%
Bits2.1%
Bitcoin + Sats43.8%
Bitcoin + Bits2.1%
All of them6.3%
48 votes \ poll ended
53 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 15 Dec
I actually like Carvalho’s proposal. I haven’t followed the fighting though. I also don’t think people will support it. Too many people are attached to what they think they understand about Bitcoin’s success.
reply
Is there a lot of fighting going on with the terminology?
reply
for onchain wallets - BTC for LN wallets - sats
reply
This is the way.
reply
So progressive Darth!
reply
I always used this display in my wallets. Is the most logic one. Onchain you are doing transactions, that means bitcoin (with display 8 decimals). You are holding, not making payments. On LN you are doing payments, that means you are dealing with sats. The whole LN system is using sats (not bitcoin) and even msats (mostly for fees).
reply
It's the most logical way to deal with denominations. Not a single person uses BTC for LN, it's always sats.
reply
Sats hands down. Now that I can think of 1000 sats is about a dollar, its easier to make a translation in my mind when needed. I am looking foward to 1 sat being about a penny. Won't be long now.
reply
It has gotten easier now. But dont get too caught up in the fiat mindset.
reply
Definitely. I value sats way more than the way they convert. Spending 5$ feels like nothing. Spending 5000 sats feels like a lot to me. Because I know how much I can make happen with 5000 sats on here and nostr.
reply
Yes, its important to have it relative to something. But keep in mind fiat is depreciating.
reply
what happens at BTC = $1,000,000
reply
10 sats will be a dollar, right?
reply
I prob did meth instead of math or something, but doesn't it become like bit is now?
reply
"BITCOIN" (only) will create a lot of confusion, will be a goldmine for scammers.
reply
Bitcoin and sats. Although I find it a little awkward that 100 000 000 stas is one bitcoin (the number of zeroes does not divide by 3), but that's what it is.
reply
For sats below 100M, Satoshis is more appropriate.
For sats above 100M, Bitcoins is more appropriate.
reply
Bitcoin+sats
reply
ah shit... clicked "sats" already before I realized there was a "bitcoin+sats" option.
PLEASE, DEMOCRATIC OVERLORD, COULD YOU ADJUST MY VOTE?!
reply
Bitcoin + Bits + Sats
reply
Where did this discussion come from? I also saw some memes on nostr.
reply
reply
Thanks Darth! What a bullshit idea tbh
reply
I am just a fan of bitcoin. As easy as it is to call it sats, bitcoin encompasses everything. For the people who know, you can just say point zero one bitcoin and they will know it means 0.01 btc.
reply
Bitcoin and sat , it's my mental cliché.
reply
Kibbles ‘n bits
reply
Damn who would of know stackers just want all of them lol
reply
Republic credits.