Bitcoin has all of the properties of real money, like being a reliable medium of exchange and the best known store of value ever known to mankind - sure - but does hodling bitcoin come without its consequences?

After spending months reading posts in bitcoiner communities online, I've come to the following conclusions about the risks you face in becoming a bitcoiner.

So many bitcoiners spend a large portion of their time finding ways to be independent of government tentacles. This presents a huge risk, especially if you have sold your soul to banking cartels or socialist state bureaucrats. I recommend anyone who sees themselves as an arm of the state seriously think twice about buying and hodling bitcoin. Holding real money gives people their humanity back to them, which can be painful and unpleasant if you don't have a soul, are made of wood, or live your life sucking WEF boots.

This is obvious, but it needs be said. People holding bitcoin are more likely to use their brain than people who don't, according to polling. Beware. Your brain is a big organ and takes lots of energy to use. Living on fiat food such as seed oils, sugar and other things manufactured in a lab, having your energy drained by bureaucracies, and constantly having to think about DEI is already too much for most people's brains to handle. Just look at how families are crumbling, the social fabric of our worlds greatest nations coming apart at the seams, and how chronic disease is higher than ever despite record spending in the healthcare industry. Don't waste your energy putting your brain to work. You already have too much to worry about.

Along with actually using your brain to think, holding real money is likely to lead you to question reality at a deeper level. This is not exactly expedient when you have an irrational attachment to a theiving institution like the IMF or central banks. Nobody wants to be that person always asking questions when there's an agenda to push. Besides, it hurts a NPC's when you question them, especially on DEI.

The 47th president of the United States is espousing Bitcoin and crypto. Which side of history do you want to be on?

Hodling bitcoin severely increases your chances of observing traditional family values since it leaves you vulnerable to the dangerous mindset of being "future oriented." When people fall victim to this way of thinking, that is, when they start priortizing their future security because of a belief in a freer, less centralized world, they don't think about the cost of having kids. Far from being a signal of their spiritual development, bitcoiners' reckless procreation is a direct result of their being brazenly insubordinate to the same globalists that want to protect everyone's feelings.

Since bitcoiners are future orientaed, they tend to be more likely to delay gratification. Putting today's desires before tomorrow's needs is crucial to ensuring the continued success of our banks. Credit expansion, quantative easing and bond issuance are tools that are used to make sure big business maintains profitability and our economy stays on track with its inflationary targets. If everyone stops borrowing and spending recklessly, these tools become moot and central banks cease to be effective in ensuring economic stability. If people stop desiring things more than they desired to save, our economy begins to flounder. Bitcoin is immune to these tools. It doesn't lose in value, but actually increases, so people using it therefore choose save their wealth and desire less to waste their money on needless things.

The economic impact of people desiring to save more and spend less is that prices will fall. It is basic supply and demand. Bitcoin cannot be ignored because it cannot be controlled by any government or tyrant. For this reason, it cannot be arbitrarily inflated. People who are not hypnotized into only thinking about the present, therefore, are convinced it's value will always increase. If too many people become convinced of this simple falsity (i.e. that their savings won't lose value) then demand for material things falls and the vaue of bitcoin continues to rise. Price stability needs inflation and Bitcoin kills inflation.

Experts argue that if someone had a powerful enough quantum computer they would be able to break the encryption on bitcoin wallets. Most people don't understand quantum, but quantum stocks are rising because people usually buy into trending tech stuff, especially when they don't understand it. The bottom line is that one day there will be a quantum computer strong enough to hack into any type encryption known today. Scary stuff for anyone hodling bitcoin.

People who hold bitcoin tend to view everything through the same lens. They think rationally about their spending, question authoritative knowledge and institutions. They form communities online, leveraging technogy. They question the nature of their life pursuits since they view bitcoin as a means of storing their energy output for the future. This paradigm shift ripples throughout their whole being. They start to become lackadaisical about their jobs, travel more, spend more time with their family and pursue their real interests because they believe that these things are more important than your career. They tend not to embroil themselves in political squabbles that they view as "needless." Worst of all, they hide behind being humble, thinking thay no one sees their actual lunacy.

They tend to view foundational principals of freedom as absolute, such as those on which the constitution was built. What they don't recognize is that the founding fathers of the United States and their transcendental ideas were suited for less evolved humans and don't fit the mold of of modern values. Bitcoiners view their time and labour as something thay they can monopolize and rightfully withhold from the rest of society.

In sum, what bitcoiners don't appreciate is that the future is made by the globalists, not tech-savvy crypto-anarchists. Do you really want to be someone who embraces technological progress without blind adherence to authority, political progressivism or a globalist worldview?