pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 23 replies \ @justin_shocknet 20 Dec \ parent \ on: Covenant support comparison by Vortex bitcoin
There's no point arguing with you any more than there is explaining quantum physics to a jellyfish
So you can't make a legitimate rebuttal because you don't know how or because you lack the information to do so?
reply
I've explained several ways
You don't like it because you're a disingenuous and mostly illiterate bozo that believes in mythical offline L2s... hopeless case.
reply
And I've explained how you're wrong and you literally couldn't even rebuttal yet still think you're right, so I guess you are indeed a hopeless case. Best of luck spammer.
reply
Would you support a base unit increase to make self custody on-chain more accessible to mud farmers?
reply
Is this your rebuttal to me telling you LNhance is not a scam? Asking me if I would support increasing the supply cap? Of course not, supply cap will never be raised wtf are you even talking about.
reply
Still 21M whole coins
But new millisat based unit
Would solve scaling and is offline
Si or no?
reply
Wow you are going off on an extremely ridiculous tangent. Obviously creating new units doesn't solve any kind of scaling issue whatsoever.
reply
You want to scale to mud farmers (cheaper)
You want solutions that work offline (base chain)
You're willing to fork to do it
So what the problem is?