Why do we grade kids at all?
Finally back with another episode of BTC Teacher in Fiat Madland.
We were coming to the end of the midterms so I was busy as hell.
Midterms Are Coming
So, as a teacher, I face the typical dilemma.
Do I punish the kid with a bad grade for his misbehavior, or do I just gift good grades to give the kid an easy life?
Why am I the one to choose? Why do I have the power?
Okay, let's back up for a second.
Since I work in the public school system as a teacher, it is my job to reward the kids for their learning. Evaluating how well the child is learning is my job.
But what do we teachers do?
What we have to do is to have at least 3 grades per student per midterm.
Let us assess the situation:
I teach 15 classes a week with about 27 kids each. Let us say I have about 400 students to grade each midterm. That's 3 grades per kid times 400 kids, we end up with 1200 grades.
I have to grade about 12 tests a day, every weekday afternoon. With each test between 5-15min, that is at least 2 hours of extra work each day.
What does everyone want?
-
So the Overlord wants me to track 1200 individual learning curves over a period of 20 weeks. Sure, why not. So he can get statistics from ever smarter kids to justify public spending.
-
The kids want good grades to avoid trouble at home or with their teachers, honestly they couldn't care less about their learning progress (for the fast majority), so they cheat as much as they can and learn as little as possible.
-
For me as a teacher, the incentive is to make grading as easy as possible so that I dont waste my free time with 1200 tests.
So what is the result? The government forces me to give unnecessary tests, most of my colleagues will give multiple choice or yes-no questions to not waste their free time, and kids will cheat like hell on them.
Isn't education wonderful?
But wait, where is the teaching? where is the learning? where is the fun? right?
Yeah, not there.
What's my problem?
Since my own standard does not allow me to do stupid yes-no questions and I am too proud to do multiple choice tests, I do tests where the kids have to prove their critical thinking skills. This comes at a high price, kids have a very hard time cheating in my classes, they get angry. I have a very high price in the form of long grading time, so I sacrifice a lot of my free time in the afternoon. But for what exactly?
Yes, the kids, for the most part, enjoy my classes and I would say they even learn a lot more than in other classes. I also encourage critical thinking and the ability to think for oneself.
But at what cost? I waste a lot of my time and force the kids to actually learn and sacrifice a lot of their time. For a grade that does not even matter because it will never reflect the learning curve of the child. Just what I set as a standard.
My experiment
So this year I was running an experiment in the 10th grade econ class.
Still teaching the same class with the same topics and values. But the grading was not in the form of my typical tests. Instead I used the ECB workbooks and divided them into 3 sections, collected them 3 times this semester and graded those.
The result, they seem to have learned nothing. Sure, they were entertained in my class, but what they wrote down as a reflection of what was in their heads was terrible.
What to do now?
So should I go back and sacrifice time and effort from my side and from 1200 students to get the learning curve going again or should I blend into the incentives given and just give up, do some multiple choice test, let them cheat and everyone is happy?
Government gets its "smart" kids and good results, kids get good grades and happy parents and they don't have to learn anything they don't want to know and I save a lot of free time for my family?
What do you think about this?
What do you think about the school grades in gernarl?
Let me know!