reply on: LN Blackjack? \ stacker news ~Stacker

pull down to refresh

309 sats \ 17 replies \ @grayruby 14h \ on: LN Blackjack? Stacker_Sports

I want to having an SN poker night at some point. Would you be interested?

161 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 14h

Maybe we’ll have poker in the @saloon one day as @k00b mentioned on SNL

140 sats \ 0 replies \ @OneOneSeven 12h

This makes me think the saloon needs mini territories that refresh daily and we call them "Tables."

76 sats \ 0 replies \ @DavidDobis 13h

I am in.

21 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 14h

That would be awesome.

51 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 13h

I’m getting new ideas for bots. Does SN need a blackjack bot?

Is this how we make stackers zap more? By tapping into their degenerate nature?

32 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 13h

Blackjack is probably easier than poker to do.

200 sats \ 3 replies \ @siggy47 OP 14h

Yes, but I never can tell who was the sucker at the table until I get home and look in the mirror.

80 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 14h

What if we did a poker night where 50% of pot went to Running Bitcoin https://secure.alsnetwork.org/site/TR?fr_id=1510&pg=entry

And the rest went to the winner or top 3 players, however we want to dole it out.

51 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 OP 14h

Great idea. I'm all for it. How difficult would it be to set up and play? I can't envision it.

161 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 14h

My initial thought would be 8 players 25k sat buy in each for a total of 200k sats. 100k goes to the charity. Winner gets 100k or we can say top 3 split 100k maybe 50k to winner and two and three get their buy in back or something to that effect.

There is a lightning poker site. That would be ideal but we may need to use something that allows us to create a custom game.

Let me reach out to lnpoker and see if we can set something up.

40 sats \ 6 replies \ @DavidDobis 13h

https://lightning-poker.com/

Have you seen this site. We could play here. No Rake on the lower stakes tables. Onbly 1% on the others.

40 sats \ 3 replies \ @Turdinthepunchbowl 11h

I've always wanted to play on that site, but it's usually empty. I'd be in to play some poker at some point if there's a group planning a "poker night".

21 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 11h

I played on there a couple years ago but every time I go to the site it is empty. Might be good for us in that case. Then we can have the run of the place.

50 sats \ 1 reply \ @Turdinthepunchbowl 11h

True, the fact it's empty may be favorable for a group to just show up and use a table. There used to be a site Blockchain.poker that was pretty great but I think they got scared of by the custodial aspect back when Alby/Phoenix and others did as well to avoid possible enforcement actions, so they shut down.

61 sats \ 0 replies \ @DavidDobis 10h

I never used that one. I like this one alright. I went back recently for the first time in a while and I was pleasantly surprised to see I had some sats still sitting there. Good sign, for the integrity of the site I feel.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 13h

This is what I was hoping to use.

I messaged them on Twitter to see if they could accommodate us. We could use it this way but a closed custom game would be better for us.

40 sats \ 0 replies \ @DavidDobis 13h

I really like the simplicity. But it is so dead in there usually. But if we schedule something, I am in.