pull down to refresh

Honestly, this is hilarious on some level. To anyone with average intelligence it was clear from the beginning that Elon is not for free speech.

Up until today

Here is are the major impediments to free speech on X the every platform as to my knowledge:
  • Banning the account that tracks Elons private jet. It is kind of understandable on a human level but this was the first sign that there is no free speech on X. There is no compromise, there isn't even a slippery slope: either there is free speech or there is not. It should also be noted that accounts that track Taylor Swifts jet ARE STILL UP! Hypocrisy.
  • Banning the word "cisgender". Even if you're a rightwing "anti-woke" culture warrior I expect you to acknowledge that any compromises to free speech are destroying all free speech, including the ones one does not agree with

Yesterday night

I do not think that freedom of speech is freedom of reach. But I do consider what happened tonight a wakeup call for everyone who is still in denial. Major impediments to reach until yesterday were afaik only on broad strokes on liberal and leftist accounts and maybe a few people personally like probably Grimes and Ron Desantis. Major impediments to reach as of today:
  • Laura Loomer personally and a forceful removal of all her paid subscribers
  • "The conservative OG" had their organization badge removed, all accounts associated lost their blue check reach multiplier (they are still paying tho)
  • Speculative: I suspect but do not know for sure that accounts associated with the VC or tech scene got a malus now. If it's the same malus or a softer one than liberal/leftist have is unclear. Maybe Twitter engineers have programmed a whole system for manual malus factors now.
  • Individually suspended accounts:
    It seems like Elon personally was angered yesterday night with a few people ratioing him personally and they got a ban personally.

Conclusion

You do not get free speech just because it's "your guy" who's in charge. A digital town square must not centralized. It could consist of multiple plattforms (e.g. Fediverse) or one decentralized plattform (e.g. Nostr). But it cannot be one plattform.
Elon is the worst person in the world right now.
reply
Honestly, this is hilarious on some level. To anyone with average intelligence it was clear from the beginning that Elon is not for free speech.
Couldn't agree more. Now that he's aligned with Trump bitcoiners seem to ignore all the many reasons to dismiss this guy.
reply
many reasons to dismiss this guy
Give me one.
reply
Well, the OP gave a good one. Here are a few more of his greatest hits:
We're really just trying to accelerate the events of sustainable energy. One of the downsides of crypto is that it is computationally quite energy-intensive."
Dogecoin may be my favorite cryptocurrency. It's pretty cool."
On May 12th, Musk unexpectedly posted a tweet that announced Tesla would no longer accept Bitcoin for its cars as it is "concerned about rapidly increasing use of fossil fuels for Bitcoin mining and transactions, especially coal, which has the worst emissions of all."
reply
OP gave a good one
No he didn't #826312
Bitcoin
Reality is that had he not been part of the enabling of Space Force and the seizure of twitter, Bitcoin would be the farthest thing from anyones minds in that extremely dark timeline.
All the whining about him reeks of envy, which is all the left has.
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @2112 27 Dec
I don’t think Elon is bad. In fact rather the opposite, he’s lit a torch on a hill. Doesn’t mean we should stop there - yes keep climbing because you’re right true freedom of speech will be decentralized and disintermediated
reply
The Hammer of Justice 🤣🤣🤣
reply
A digital town square must not centralized. It could consist of multiple plattforms (e.g. Fediverse) or one decentralized plattform (e.g. Nostr). But it cannot be one plattform.
Is SN in the running?
reply
I think interconnected centralized plattforms are in the run together.
"SN inside the Nostr network" is in the running, yes.
reply
So is it the decentralized aspect, the pub/private key and data sovereignty, or the bitcoin aspect?
To me information networks themselves seem inherently centralizing, which I think is a symptom of "network effects."
reply
A real decentralized platform is always preferable. A federation of centralized platforms is a compromise. The problem are closed centralized platforms.
To me the main point is moderation, abuse of power, algorithmic feeds etc. If there are pub/private keys or any of the other stuff you mentioned is only secondary to me. Feel free to disagree.
reply
The problem are closed centralized platforms.
I agree
To me the main point is moderation, abuse of power, algorithmic feeds
Nostr relays are moderated, as in users can be removed/censored from them. It's still so early so we can't really tell if/how this will be abused. And nostr clients are using algorithmic feeds now. Also, the social media use case for Nostr is just one of many, and for it to compete here while being decentralized, I don't really know how it will look.
Social networks ubiquity is what attracts normies to them and a big reason they are so useful. In other words, I think people use them because they offer a maximal reach, 'anyone can be a star'. Not saying I like this, but seems true.
If there are pub/private keys or any of the other stuff you mentioned is only secondary to me.
Private and public key ownership is what makes Nostr a good protocol for maintaining decentralization, because users are free to take there data to any client/app they please. In this sense Nostr is 'open.' This is a positive.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @galt 9h
Free speech advocates recommend Nostr, everything else is or can be captured and people will jump from platform to platform (e.g., X to blusky) until realising that it's Nostr only
reply
Sounds like malcontent cope like most of OP's shit euro-weenie takes.
At least half these anecdotes are false, the others are allegations by cringe accounts ironically made on this same platform they're accusing... therefore retarded.
If you don't like that app, don't use it... crying here about it is just a virtue signal.
Reality is it's the consensus network of 0-minute news with no real competition to speak of on the gradient of free speech (I bet the over-jabbed OP has never cried this much about Gab)
Should free speech absolutists use Nostr? Probably, but unfortunately there's no usable implementation of it because there's more virtue signaling than building... I can't do it all myself.
reply
As expected
reply
reply
well there's nostr, people crying when there are viable alternatives
i have to say though, watching the chaos unfold and potential justice hammering is entertaining
reply
Yeah, there are criticisms of Elon that may be open to debate, but the claim that he's any sort of supporter of free speech is ludicrous.
reply
Elon will upload his consciousness to the cloud and live forever to rule this world. Mark my words.
reply
fuck elon
reply
X is Elon speech, not free speech. Stay away. I've ignored it for more than 6 months now.
Nostr is better. SN is a gem.
reply